Support The Moscow Times!

The World's Future Is a Matter of Human Choice

What does the future hold for the global economy? Will living standards rise worldwide as today's poor countries leapfrog technologies to catch up with richer countries? Or will prosperity slip through our fingers as greed and corruption lead us to deplete vital resources and degrade the natural environment on which human well-being depends? Humanity faces no greater challenge than to ensure a world of prosperity rather than a world that lies in ruins.

Like a novel with two possible endings, ours is a story yet to be written in this new century. There is nothing inevitable about the spread —or collapse — of prosperity. More than we know (or perhaps care to admit), the future is a matter of human choice, not mere prediction.

Despite the ongoing economic crisis in Europe and the U.S., the developing world has sustained rapid economic growth. While the International Monetary Fund forecasts that the advanced economies will grow just 1.5 percent in 2013, growth in developing nations is projected to reach 5.6 percent. Asia's developing economies, now the world's pacesetters, are expected to grow 7.2 percent, with output in sub-Saharan Africa set to rise a healthy 5.7 percent.

What is happening is both powerful and clear. Technologies that were once found only in rich countries now belong to the entire world. Cell phone coverage in sub-Saharan Africa, for example, has gone from nearly zero subscribers 20 years ago to around 700 million today. Those phones are helping to bring banking, health care, education, business, government services and entertainment to the poor. Within a few years, the vast majority of the world will have access to wireless broadband.

Yet there is another truth as well. Last year was the hottest ever recorded in the U.S. Droughts afflicted around 60 percent of U.S. counties, including the breadbasket states of the Midwest and the Great Plains. In October, an extraordinary "superstorm" smashed into the Atlantic coastline around New Jersey, causing losses of around $60 billion. Climate problems — floods, droughts, heat waves, extreme storms and massive forest fires — also ravaged many other parts of the world in 2012, including China, Australia, Southeast Asia, the Caribbean and Africa's Sahel region.

These environmental disasters are occurring with rising frequency, as they are partly caused by human actions, such as deforestation, coastal erosion, massive pollution and, of course, the greenhouse-gas emissions that are changing the world's climate and acidifying the oceans. What is new is that scourges like climate change, until recently described as a future threat, are now clear and present dangers. Scientists have even given a name to our era, the anthropocene, in which humanity is having a large-scale impact on the planet's ecosystems.

Herein lies our great challenge, the one that will determine whether we follow the path of prosperity or ruin. The rapidly growing developing countries cannot simply follow the economic-growth path that today's rich countries traveled. If they try, the world economy will push the planet beyond safe operating conditions. Temperatures will rise, storms will intensify, the oceans will become more acidic and species will go extinct in vast numbers as their habitats are destroyed.

The simple fact is that humanity faces a stark choice. If the world economy's current growth patterns continue, we face ecological disaster. If the world economy embraces a new growth pattern, one that harnesses advanced technologies like smartphones, broadband, precision agriculture and solar power, we can spread prosperity while saving the planet.

I call today's growth pattern the business-as-usual option. In contrast, the smart-technology growth pattern represents the sustainable-development option. Business as usual can work for a while, but it will end in tears, while the sustainable-development path can lead to long-term prosperity.

So what will it take to write the happy ending? First, we must recognize that we, as a global society, have a choice to make. Business as usual is comfortable. We think we understand it, yet it is not good enough. In our current trajectory, short-term prosperity is coming at the cost of too many future crises.

Second, we must recognize the powerful new tools and technologies that we have at hand. Using advanced information technologies such as computers, satellite mapping, image processing and expert systems, we now have the means to grow more food with less environmental damage, improve public health for rich and poor alike and distribute more electricity with lower greenhouse-gas emissions. We can also make our cities more livable and healthier, even as urbanization raises their populations by billions in the coming decades.

Third, we should set bold goals for the years ahead: to spread prosperity and improve public health while saving the planet. Fifty years ago, U.S. President John F. Kennedy said we should to go to the moon not because it was easy but because it was hard. The challenge tested the best in us. In our generation, sustainable development will be our test, encouraging us to use our creativity and human values to establish a path of sustainable well-being on our crowded and endangered planet.

The greatest talents in our societies — in universities, businesses, nongovernmental organizations and especially among the world's young people — are ready to take on our greatest challenges and are joining the UN's new Sustainable Development Solutions Network. In the months and years ahead, these leaders will share their visions of a prosperous and sustainable global society.

Jeffrey Sachs, professor and director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University, is special adviser to the United Nations secretary-general on the Millennium Development Goals. © Project Syndicate

The views expressed in opinion pieces do not necessarily reflect the position of The Moscow Times.

… we have a small favor to ask. As you may have heard, The Moscow Times, an independent news source for over 30 years, has been unjustly branded as a "foreign agent" by the Russian government. This blatant attempt to silence our voice is a direct assault on the integrity of journalism and the values we hold dear.

We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. Our commitment to providing accurate and unbiased reporting on Russia remains unshaken. But we need your help to continue our critical mission.

Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and you can be confident that you're making a significant impact every month by supporting open, independent journalism. Thank you.

paiment methods
Not ready to support today?
Remind me later.

Read more