×
Enjoying ad-free content?
Since July 1, 2024, we have disabled all ads to improve your reading experience.
This commitment costs us $10,000 a month. Your support can help us fill the gap.
Support us
Our journalism is banned in Russia. We need your help to keep providing you with the truth.

Worries Over Russian Assets Cloud BP's Post-Spill Comeback

Selling TNK-BP in 2012 left BP with a 19.75 percent stake in state-owned Rosneft that some say is a risky asset. Andrei Makhonin

In the two months after April 20, 2010, when an explosion at the Deepwater Horizon oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico caused the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history, BP shares lost nearly two-thirds of their value as the scale of the disaster threatened to sink the company.

BP sold $40 billion worth of prime assets to stay afloat — and spent $42.5 billion on the spill clean-up, fines and provisions for future costs.

As part of that sell-off, BP extracted about $12 billion from the company's troublesome Russian investment, TNK-BP. Of that, it has given about $8 billion of it back to shareholders.

But it has yet to prove that the remaining half — which became a 19.75 percent stake in state-controlled Rosneft — is anything more than a high-risk minority holding in a company based in a politically unpredictable country, despite its seat on the board.

BP CEO Bob Dudley "does not seem to have that pally relationship you need with Igor Sechin," said an industry source who has done business with the Rosneft CEO.

Dudley himself remains confident of his Russian move. "BP's strategic investment in Rosneft allows us access to growth opportunities previously unavailable to us in Russia, one of the world's largest producers of oil and gas combined with unparalleled resource potential," he said in October last year.

Despite the convulsions that BP has been through since the 2010 spill, the company has made a remarkable comeback. If you had spent £10 on BP shares on April 19, 2010, you would have just £9 now, including dividends.

The shares are flirting with post-spill highs, and  the second-best performer in the industry's top five behind Exxon Mobil since the start of the fourth quarter.

This may have something to do with the misfortunes of its peer group — a profit warning at Shell, cost overruns at Chevron, and worries about cashflow and production at Exxon — not to mention a price-enhancing share buyback program put in place last year, but it is still quite a turnaround in sentiment from 2010.

In a note published Friday downgrading profit forecasts across the sector, analysts at UBS predict BP's return on average capital employed, or ROACE, this year will be 11 percent — on  par with Shell's.

BP shed a big chunk of its earning power to pay for the spill, but got prices that now look enviable as the industry cycle turns down. Rivals are now falling over each other to get assets on the block, at the risk of driving prices lower.

A leaner, meaner asset base has emerged, too. Meanwhile, having settled criminal proceedings, and two phases into a three-stage civil trial, an army of lawyers is working to push remaining spill fines and penalties way into the future. Barely a week goes by without a new legal challenge from the British group aimed at keeping a lid on its liabilities.

"BP has become a litigation-dominated company, and they have an issue in Russia," said oil and gas blogger and independent industry investment adviser Malcolm Graham-Wood.

A Message from The Moscow Times:

Dear readers,

We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."

These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.

We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.

Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.

By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.

Once
Monthly
Annual
Continue
paiment methods
Not ready to support today?
Remind me later.

Read more