| To Our Readers | |
The Moscow Times welcomes letters to the editor. Letters for publication should be signed and bear the signatory's address and telephone number. |
In addition, excessively high salaries for CEOs of state-owned companies will attract talented managers from the private sector, and this, on the whole, is bad for the economy. But this problem is irrelevant for now because economic growth in Russia is so high that there is little chance of any widespread firing of CEOs.
The simplest way to regulate CEO salaries is through taxes. Russia currently has a flat personal income tax of 13 percent, and this has one distinct advantage: The taxes are easy to collect. Even in more developed economies, wealthy individuals spend a substantial amount of money trying to minimize their tax liabilities and lobbying legislators for favorable tax laws. A flat tax saves the time and expense of these efforts. On the other hand, the low 13 percent personal tax rate acts as a stimulus to Russian companies to pay CEOs enormous salaries.
Making the transition to a progressive tax system is a difficult task, but the government could begin with one simple measure -- institute a progressive inheritance tax in which the rich pay far more than people of moderate means. Furthermore, any inheritance of less than 30 million rubles, for example, would be tax exempt. An inheritance tax would not hamper people's desire to work, and it would lower economic inequalities in the next generation.
You might object and say that people could easily avoid paying inheritance tax by re-registering their property in their children's names. But that is actually a good thing, because when property passes from one generation to the next, it strengthens ownership rights as a fundamental legal institution.
Konstantin Sonin, a professor at the New Economic School/CEFIR, is a columnist for Vedomosti.
A Message from The Moscow Times:
Dear readers,
We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."
These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.
We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.
Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.
By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.
Remind me later.
