The country's top general said Tuesday that U.S. missile defense plans were directed against Russia and differences over the issue are holding up an arms treaty with Washington, news agencies reported.
The remarks revived questions about the chances for an agreement soon on a successor to a Cold War-era nuclear weapons reduction treaty that expired in December.
"The development and establishment of the [U.S.] missile shield is directed against the Russian Federation," said Nikolai Makarov, the armed forces chief of staff, Interfax reported.
U.S. President Barack Obama pleased Russia by scrapping the previous administration's plans to deploy elements of a missile shield in Poland and the Czech Republic, which was bitterly opposed by Moscow.
Makarov said Russia still had serious concerns about Obama's revised plans, which are based on sea- and land-based missile interceptors in Europe, despite American insistence that they are no threat to Russia.
"Despite the declarations of those statesmen who say that, on the contrary, it provides for our security, that's far from the case," he said, RIA-Novosti reported. "For this reason it's completely understandable that we have a very negative attitude about this issue."
Russian and U.S. officials have said they are close to agreement on a successor to the 1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, or START I, which was a key part of efforts to improve relations.
But Makarov said differences over missile defense were among reasons "why we have not yet reached a signing of this agreement," RIA-Novosti reported.
His comments also raised questions about whether Russia is ready to sign a treaty that makes little or no mention of missile defense — an issue that Moscow says is inextricably linked with offensive missiles.
A Message from The Moscow Times:
Dear readers,
We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."
These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.
We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.
Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.
By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.
Remind me later.