Install

Get the latest updates as we post them — right on your browser

Today's paper. Last Updated: 05/28/2012

We, the Middle Class, Are Not Revolutionaries

Other Russia leader Eduard Limonov wrote in on his LiveJournal blog: "If the bourgeois leaders had not led the tens of thousands of angry citizens from the center of town, that evening they could have been in the State Duma or Central Elections Commission."

That is, according to Limonov, the protesters should have violently stormed and seized the State Duma.

My question is, "Who, according to Limonov, should have taken the Duma? Me, for example? Or perhaps journalist Leonid Parfyonov or writer Boris Akunin, together with their wives and children, whom we met an hour before the rally?

I attended the rally as an ordinary participant, and I saw what type of crowd it was. With the exception of a few flag-waving groups of professional revolutionaries, 80 percent of those present were young, educated white-collar managers. In other words, it was Russia's "Third Estate" — a bourgeois crowd.

The political fringe did not attend the demonstration because they will not go anywhere without a bribe of at least 100 rubles, and for 100 rubles they would even support Vasily Yakemenko, head of the Federal Agency for Youth Affairs.

The pensioners did not join in because they only protest issues like the monetization of benefits, not the falsification of election results.

Since those who did show up at the demonstration had a head on their shoulders, they had no intention of seizing the State Duma simply to satisfy Limonov.

If Limonov thinks an opportunity was lost, why doesn't he storm the Duma building himself along with his 500 supporters?

And if Limonov thought that socialite Ksenia Sobchak, journalists Bozhena Rynska and Leonid Parfyonov and tens of thousands of other successful people who are able to think with their own brains would seize the Duma based on his command, he is deeply mistaken. It is as if Limonov appointed himself chief of the Central Elections Commission, stole millions of votes, and acted as if he had a mandate from millions of Russians.

I will not try to speak for all the tens of thousands of angry citizens. I will speak only for myself. I had never attended a street demonstration before because I had always considered them a complete waste of time. I took part in this rally because it would have been unconscionable not to.

If, when we gathered on Bolotnaya Ploshchad, someone had told me to seize the Duma, I would not have gone. Why should I? To take a bullet for Limonov? I cannot speak for Parfyonov and Sobchak, but I don't feel a personal need for such action.

I did exactly what I wanted to do and achieved exactly the result I was after. We, the Russian Third Estate — the virtual party of blogger and up-and-coming politician Alexei Navalny — showed the ruling kleptocracy that if they want to avoid a revolution, they are going to have to dump Prime Minister Vladimir Putin.

We showed the ruling elite that Putin will not be the country's dictator for life. And nobody has any intention of letting Limonov become dictator — not even for a day.

Yulia Latynina hosts a political talk show on Ekho Moskvy radio.





This article has 0 comments on TheMoscowTimes.com and 3 comments on Facebook.

Leave a comment


Discussion
The Moscow Times welcomes your comments and invites you to discuss topics with other readers. Your comment will be posted automatically to enable a live discussion. If you aren't familiar with our comments policy, you can read it here.

If you're a registered user, you can start typing your comment below. If not, take a moment to sign up. and then return to the article.

If your comment doesn't appear, contact us by using our web form.

Comments

Comments via Facebook



Also in Opinion

There's Just One Nationality — Mathematician

Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind."

Russia's New Propaganda Minister

After Monday's announcement that historian Vladimir Medinsky was appointed the culture minister, critics quickly labeled him the new propaganda minister. Medinsky's academic ethics and historical distortions may raise serious questions, but for the Kremlin, he has three important attributes that are much more important: He is a model United Russia leader, a firm Putin loyalist and a skilled sophist.

Spinning Medvedev's Government

Were this 2008 and not 2012 — and had Dmitry Medvedev been named prime minister without having first served a full term as president — then the composition of his new government might have created a generally positive impression.

New Government Faces Old Problems

A longstanding platitude shared by both the Kremlin as well as domestic and foreign analysts is the need for Russia to diversify its economy away from energy dependence and reduce its non-oil budget deficit.

Putin's Postman Delivers Nothing at the G8

In the mid-1990s, former President Boris Yeltsin fought hard for the right to sit as equal at the same table with the leaders of the world's seven leading democracies. Using a lot of political wrangling, Moscow finally secured permanent membership in this elite club where the real heavyweights are supposed to solve the world's most pressing problems.

Russia Stays Home

Just three days before his return to the Kremlin as president, Vladimir Putin met behind closed doors at his residence in Novo-Ogaryovo, outside Moscow, with U.S. National Security Adviser Tom Donilon, who was there to transmit President Barack Obama's renewed determination to strengthen cooperation with Russia.



print


Comments

This article has 0 comments on TheMoscowTimes.com and 3 comments on Facebook.

Leave a comment


Tags
opposition
To Our Readers

The Moscow Times welcomes letters to the editor. Letters for publication should be signed and bear the signatory's address and telephone number.

Letters to the editor should be sent by fax to (7-495) 232-6529, by e-mail to oped@imedia.ru, or by post. The Moscow Times reserves the right to edit letters.



Most Read
MarketGid