Install

Get the latest updates as we post them — right on your browser

Today's paper. Last Updated: 02/10/2012

Don’t Hold Your Breath for a Modern Russia

Don’t hold your breath!”

That is how Prime Minister Vladimir Putin answered the question asked during Thursday’s televised call-in show, “Do you ever want to quit politics with all its problems and to live for yourself, for your family and relax?” This pithy quip not only answers the specific question posed, but it also answers the broader question of whether there will be any changes to the autocracy that he has built up over the past nine years. In one single phrase, Putin set the record straight for Russia and the world.

Many commentators have remarked that the call-in program — Putin’s eighth — was completely lacking in substance. Putin’s fans spoke of his psychotherapeutic talents in which he reassures his audience that everything in the country is under control. The authorities know everything and are taking care of everything so there is no need to worry. But the opposite is true. The four-hour program was full of very specific content, and what’s more, Putin spelled out Russia’s future in explicit detail.

Putin all but announced his presidential bid for the 2012 election, saying he would make that decision “based on the situation in the economy and in the social sphere,” while spending the entire four hours telling his rapt listeners how well everything is going in the country.

If you are expecting changes in the Cabinet, don’t hold your breath. Putin warmly thanked his ministers for their excellent job performance. For example, he spoke out against radically changing the country’s police force — the focus of a lot of discussion ever since State Duma Deputy Andrei Makarov from United Russia proposed liquidating the nearly 1-million-member police force and building a leaner and more qualified one from scratch. There is nothing to fear now for Energy Minister Sergei Shmatko, who heads the board of directors of RusHydro, the company that owns the Sayano-Shushenskaya hydroelectric plant where 75 people died in August. Nor has Emergency Situations Minister Sergei Shoigu anything to worry about. He heads the agency that allows people to be burned alive in nightclubs that do not comply with the most basic fire-safety regulations. Neither should Federal Security Service director Alexander Bortnikov lose any sleep, even though his agency failed to prevent a second bombing of the Nevsky Express train or curb the growing wave of terrorism in the Caucasus. Putin has made it explicitly clear that these are his handpicked men, that they do not fall under President Dmitry Medvedev’s jurisdiction, and that he will never betray staff members who are loyal and proven — no matter how many people die because of government corruption and gross negligence.

Regarding corruption, Putin’s answer to this eternal problem was the most vague of the 87 questions that he fielded during the program.

If you are expecting Putin to modernize the economy, don’t hold your breath. Putin outlined his economic strategy very clearly, and it differs strikingly from Medvedev’s vague plans for modernization. The main points of Putin’s economic policy are protectionism and maintaining the strength of state-owned companies, which he called a “necessity.” And it does not include limiting monopolization and bureaucratization of the economy or improving transparency and the country’s investment climate.

While defending nationalization, Putin took advantage of the opportunity to condemn the privatization of the 1990s that “ruined the unified industrial complex” of the country. He hotly defended the introduction of higher import duties on automobiles, agricultural equipment and other goods. Putin stated that it is more important for Russia to integrate the economies of the Commonwealth of Independent States and to create a uniform customs policy with Belarus and Kazakhstan than it is to join the World Trade Organization.

Putin took particular pride in how he intervenes directly to solve specific economic crises, coming across as the white knight who saves factory jobs. He used the call-in show to remind everyone about how in June he forced the owners of the Pikalyovo plant to keep the factory running. In the same spirit, Putin promised workers of the Izhorskiye Works, located near St. Petersburg, that Rosatom would buy their products and not those produced by their competitors. The prime minister also ordered Russian Railways to initiate nonstop train service between Moscow and Komsomolsk-on-Amur in the Khabarovsk region. Putin decreed what the Amur shipbuilding factory would construct and for what price, and he outlined the mechanism for state regulation of over-the-counter drug prices.

Putin referred to Medvedev only twice during the program — when he said they have a good relationship and when he said Medvedev “had spoken more than once” about corruption.

There is no reason for Yukos CEO Mikhail Khodorkovsky to hold his breath either. In answer to a carefully selected question about when Khodorkovsky would be released from jail, it became clear from Putin’s answer that Khodorkovsky cannot expect any form of clemency from the Kremlin. Putin used harsh words in speaking about the former oligarch, accusing him of, among other things, being connected with several killings, although no such charges were ever formally made in either the first or the second court case against Khodorkovsky.

At one point, Putin criticized the welfare mentality of Russians who have traditionally relied on government handouts. But amazingly, this did not stop Putin from playing the role of Santa Claus, personally distributing gifts to his subjects. He gave computers to rural schools, promised to personally intervene to get Moscow Aviation Institute student Nikita Kuprekov into the Komsomolsk-on-Amur Aircraft Production Association and gave an apartment to a certain Aunt Nina from Azov. Many in the Kremlin may think that this is great PR — particularly since Putin turns this trick during every call-in show — but the only problem is what to do with the other 2 million people whose questions were not chosen for this program. Apparently, they will have to wait for the next “Conversation with Vladimir Putin” and dream of getting through to the kind tsar.

In the end, Putin confirmed that everything in Russia will remain the same for a very long time. “Don’t hold your breath” should be the catchall answer to Russians expecting any kind of economic and political modernization or reform under Putin’s rule. Putin will return to the Kremlin in 2012 with the clear intention of maintaining — or even strengthening —  his two greatest political “innovations”:  the vertical power structure and sovereign democracy. And the Russian people will continue to have no choice whatsoever in the matter.

Vladimir Ryzhkov, a State Duma deputy from 1993 to 2007, hosts a political talk show on Ekho Moskvy radio.


Also in Opinion

Putin Chasing Imaginary American Ghosts

Here we go again — another round of anti-Americanism from the Kremlin and state-controlled media. Blaming outside forces for Russia's woes has a long history in the country. The closer we get to the March 4 presidential election, the more intense the anti-American hysteria becomes.


Putting Everything In Its Place

Remember how I drove you all nuts with the innate propensity of Russian creatures and inanimate objects to stand, sit or lie? And how relieved you were when I moved on to other topics?
Well, I'm back.

Russia Gets Bad Rap Over Syria

As the violent standoff between Syria's security forces and armed opposition groups roils the country, the crisis has opened heated divisions at the United Nations Security Council.

A Propaganda Breakdown

Propaganda is not as powerful as many think. You might convince Russians that people in Egypt, Italy and Ukraine are paid or otherwise persuaded to join street protests, but you certainly cannot convince them that their own dissatisfaction with the government is the result of a foreign conspiracy.

Violent Reaction to Protests Could Bury Putin

Nonviolent revolutions do not always remain nonviolent, as the examples of uprisings in Egypt, Libya and Syria in the Arab Spring have shown. But peaceful movements for regime change often do succeed. For example, they have toppled illegitimate rulers, as with the post-Soviet Color Revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine, and ended apartheid in South Africa.

Realpolitik Without Realism

People have been asking me all week why the Kremlin is so stubbornly supportive of Syrian President Bashar Assad. "Is Russia's support based solely on weapons contracts with Syria," they wonder, "or the Kremlin's desire to maintain its naval base at the Tartus port?"




Discussion
The Moscow Times welcomes your comments and invites you to discuss topics with other readers. Your comment will be posted automatically to enable a live discussion. If you aren't familiar with our comments policy, you can read it here.

If you're a registered user, you can start typing your comment below. If not, take a moment to sign up. and then return to the article.

If your comment doesn't appear, contact us by using our web form.

Comments

Comments via Facebook

print


Comments

This article has no comments.

Be the first to leave a comment



To Our Readers

The Moscow Times welcomes letters to the editor. Letters for publication should be signed and bear the signatory's address and telephone number.

Letters to the editor should be sent by fax to (7-495) 232-6529, by e-mail to oped@imedia.ru, or by post. The Moscow Times reserves the right to edit letters.



Most Read