From an issuer's perspective, going public has become increasingly difficult, cost-intensive and risky. Especially fast growing small- and mid-sized companies from emerging markets which are aiming to raise capital through a listing in the European Union or the United States face material risk associated with legal hurdles, corporate restructuring measures and advisory costs, while they cannot be sure to finally succeed in selling their shares. In comparison, selling a company to a SPAC is neither difficult nor risky, but also results in a public listing. In fact, SPACs are highly motivated buyers, as the sponsors of a SPAC who are seeking the right investment will only be rewarded if they manage to complete a transaction within a certain time period (mostly between 18-24 months). The SPAC is furthermore well prepared to finance the merger or acquisition of a target company as it typically holds the proceeds from its offering in a trust account and may also offer stock to the owners of a target company.
Investors also like SPACs, because they get the opportunity to participate in a selected investment at an early stage, but compared to private equity investments, they may benefit from the liquidity and transparency provided by public listed shares. In difficult IPO markets, the management of a SPAC can bring companies public at a reasonable valuation, which gives substantial upside potential for the listed shares. Investors may also appreciate the chance to follow prominent market experts in taking an investment decision. The management of a SPAC is mostly composed of prominent sponsors such as Steve Wozniak, the co-founder of Apple, Dan Quayle, former Vice President of the United States or, as in a recent German case, the German top managers Florian Lahnstein, Roland Berger and Thomas Middelhoff. At the same time, the downside for investors is limited. If sponsors fail to present a suitable target company within a certain time period, investors are refunded. In case a target company is found, the SPAC will be required to seek shareholder approval.
The potential advantages or disadvantage provided by a SPAC certainly depend on its setup and may differ from case to case. However, a SPAC is generally suited to alleviating some of the typical risks -- for both investors and issuers -- associated with a public offering and direct listing of a company's shares. Therefore, one may expect that even after a recovery of the conventional IPO market, Russian companies seeking an international public listing will regard the SPAC model as a reasonable alternative and new gateway to enter European or American capital markets.
A Message from The Moscow Times:
Dear readers,
We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."
These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.
We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.
Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.
By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.
Remind me later.
