Together, the two giant RBMK-type reactors churn out up to 5 percent of all Ukraine's daily energy needs.
The problem for Ukrainian officials is the station is Chernobyl.
Eight years after the world's worst nuclear disaster, Ukrainian scientists and government officials say the Chernobyl plant is being singled out unfairly by Western governments and environmentalists who want to close it.
Scientists from the International Atomic Energy Agency have certainly made no secret of their desire to see the plant shut down. They argue that the RBNK reactors are fundamentally unsafe, and warn of a possible repeat of the 1986 explosion which killed 32 and left thousands more suffering effects of radiation.
In the aftermath of the explosion at the No. 4 reactor, the Ukrainian authorities promised to decommission the remaining three Chernobyl reactors. Now, however, they appear to have changed their minds.
"What about the RBNKs in Russia -- why not close them down?" asked Nikolai Steinberg, the chairman of Ukraine's State Committee for Nuclear and Radiation Safety in Kiev.
"These reactors are not very good, because they are old," said Professor Vladimir Tokarevsky, the head of the team monitoring the reactor. "But they are not as bad as people" say.
Ukraine's increasingly defiant defense of Chernobyl is not based on any sudden or reckless enthusiasm. At the heart of the issue is the country's heavy dependence on Russia for its energy.
Russia provides about 90 percent of Ukraine's oil and nearly half its natural gas. Confronted with a rising fuel bill, Ukraine has taken a second look at nuclear power, and in particular the three reactors at Chernobyl.
Last October, the parliament voted to lift a moratorium on the construction of new nuclear plants. Officials now admit they are considering plans to reopen Chernobyl's second reactor, closed after a fire in 1991.
Western officials in Kiev say they appreciate the Ukrainian dilemma.
"It's very much a Catch-22 situation," said Bogdan Lisovitch, the deputy head of the United Nations mission in Ukraine.
There is, however, one possible solution being considered. It calls for the West to help Ukraine complete at least three other nuclear reactors now being built, to compensate for the expense of closing Chernobyl.
These newer VVER-1000 type reactors are considered a distinct improvement on the RBMKs currently in use at Chernobyl.
But this plan has not advanced beyond the planning stage yet, and in Kiev, officials are skeptical about the West's commitment.
"We need to get rid of all the 'ifs' hanging over this," Steinberg said.
A Message from The Moscow Times:
Dear readers,
We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."
These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.
We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.
Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.
By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.
Remind me later.