The jury, composed of reputable critics and writers, made a rather anticlimactic choice. Perhaps the only real surprise was that first place went to a nonfiction work instead of a novel: Bykov's biography of Boris Pasternak -- or, more precisely, his huge volume devoted to both the life and the work of the great poet, a combined genre unusual for Russia. The victory could have been a real statement, if not for the fact that Bykov is also a prolific journalist, poet, writer and television personality. One could argue that his media presence, quite apart from the virtues of the book, influenced the jury.
Second place went to Alexander Kabakov for his novel "Everything is Corrigible" and a cycle of short stories. It was the jury's safest decision -- Kabakov's books are quality mainstream literature, but hardly anything to make history. Third place was awarded to Mikhail Shishkin's "Maidenhair," a free-form novel tied together by fanciful associations.
In a surprise move, the jury announced yet another prize, something of a lifetime achievement award, which went to veteran poet Naum Korzhavin. The choice of Korzhavin, a poet belonging to the classical tradition of Russian verse, an ex-dissident and a man of notoriously bad temper, highlights both the traditionalism of the jury and an attempt at nonconformism.
Last year, the committee of the Russian Booker prize cut off its association with Open Russia, the foundation of jailed oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky, and teamed up with British Petroleum instead. While probably life-saving for the prize, the move severely undermined its moral reputation. It has been hotly debated whether the Big Book can take the Booker's place as Russia's No. 1 literary award. The inaugural result indicates that the chances are rather good, especially since the new prize is not bound by the novel genre -- a problem that has lately plagued numerous Booker nominations.
A Message from The Moscow Times:
Dear readers,
We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."
These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.
We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.
Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.
By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.
Remind me later.
