Support The Moscow Times!

VVTs Renewal Criticized

With 615 buildings, the center’s notable sites are not limited to the Stalinist pavilions lining its main thoroughfare. Vladimir Filonov

A $1.5 billion modernization program for Moscow’s iconic All-Russia Exhibition Center, or VVTs, has been heavily criticized by preservation groups who allege that the plans are likely to destroy dozens of Soviet architectural masterpieces and ruin a unique history.

Preservation group Arkhnadzor released a report late Tuesday that said the plans placed a question mark over the survival of the communist-era buildings by confidently expressing a 2016 finishing date without fully explaining how the development would unfold.

Alexei Mikushko, the new director of the VVTs company that is 70 percent owned by the federal government and 30 percent by Moscow city, announced the “rebirth” of the site last week. The 236-hectare complex originally opened in 1939 will be split into five zones — a cultural-historical zone, an innovation campus, a quality-of-life center, an exhibition-conference center and a large leisure zone.

“Nobody is intending to demolish anything,” Mikushko told a news conference Friday, and stressed that the restoration of the crumbling pavilions and other historical buildings would be a first priority.

With contributions from eight activists and experts, Arkhnadzor’s report, “VVTs: Heritage in Danger!” said these good intentions were actually limited to the most famous pavilions in the central part of the site. “The other zones they intend to actively ‘modernize’ and develop, in other words, to consolidate and build on,” it said.

Many of the center’s 615 buildings — from a variety of Soviet periods — are dotted around its extensive parkland and are much less visited than the main alley with its gushing fountains and ornate Stalinist architecture.

Natalya Dushkina, an activist with Arkhnadzor and one of the report’s authors, told The Moscow Times that objects of value such as the rabbit-breeding pavilion, the ruined open-air theater, the weather station pavilion and the buildings around the former veterinary science pavilion, which burnt to the ground in August, were under particular threat.

She also criticized the intention to alter the heritage status currently enjoyed by the VVTs so as to permit more construction. “The monuments will be less protected than they were before,” she said.

Mikushko told reporters last week that his experience as the project leader for the renovation of the former Hotel Ukraina — now the Radisson Royal Hotel — had provided him and his team with valuable experience. Arkhnadzor said the Hotel Ukraina had undergone a “brutal reconstruction.”

Clementine Cecil, the co-founder of the Moscow Architectural Preservation Society, also attacked Mikushko’s vision.

“A hotel is a very different thing to deal with, the VVTs is a planned ensemble and it requires a completely different approach,” she told The Moscow Times. “He’s not treating it as an ensemble, his plans are to break it up.”

A VVTs spokesperson said the Arkhnadzor report was a personal opinion and declined further comment.

Read more

The need for honest and objective information on Russia is more relevant now than ever before!

To keep our newsroom in Moscow running, we need your support.