Install

Get the latest updates as we post them — right on your browser

Today's paper. Last Updated: 05/28/2012

Voting With Your Feet Again

In a recent report for the Center for Strategic Studies, economists Mikhail Dmitriyev and Sergei Belanovsky concluded that “serious political changes are brewing in Russia,” and that “a political crisis in Russia is already in full swing.” There are many signs that the authors are right and are not merely aggravating the situation unfairly, as some have rushed to accuse them of doing.

The growing political crisis in Russia resembles more a slow-burning peat bog fire than the volcanic eruptions of popular revolt that recently occurred in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya. The heat and pressure in Russia are slowly but steadily growing. At any moment, however, the fire beneath the surface could turn into a massive explosion and burn Russia to the ground.

Many surveys, both independent and pro-government, confirms that the political danger of the country’s disintegration is real.

According to a nationwide survey conducted in May by the Levada Center, only 26 percent of respondents think the current government can significantly improve the situation in the near future, while 36 percent are convinced it cannot.

Meanwhile, the electoral ratings for President Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin have fallen to a record low. If elections were held today, only 24 percent of respondents said they would vote for Putin and just 21 percent would support Medvedev.

Under such conditions, the only way Putin can obtain his desired 65 percent to 70 percent of the vote is through massive electoral fraud. By all indications, he created the All-Russia People’s Front in preparation for just such a scenario, putting pressure on factories, businesses and unions to sign up their members. Putin’s sinking popularity would also explain why the Central Elections Commission has already announced that international observers will have only limited access during the vote.

Prior to Putin’s visit to Penza in April, a local survey conducted by the Institute for Regional Policy produced amazing findings. Confidence in Putin had fallen from 49.8 percent to just 17 percent. And although Medvedev, with a 39 percent rating, is more popular in Penza, 30.2 percent of those questioned said they didn’t want either of them.

Russians see the country’s ruling elite as being deeply corrupt, as blending their public service with their personal businesses and hiding those profits in foreign bank accounts. This hostility toward the ruling elite and the deep distrust of the state are the most important elements of Russia’s growing political crisis.

Confidence in United Russia is also plummeting, with current ratings at only 39 percent. The “party of thieves and crooks” fares even more poorly in large cities. For example, the Levada Center has found that only 23 percent of Muscovites are prepared to vote for United Russia.

There is a growing feeling among Russians that the country is falling apart. Rising ethnic tensions across the country have exacerbated the instability. In a May Levada Center poll among Muscovites, “the large number of people from the Caucasus and southern republics” was ranked as the third-largest problem in the city after the high cost of food and public utilities.

The growing political crisis has provoked increased capital flight, emigration and thoughts of emigration. The Levada Center survey found that 7 percent of all Russians, or 7 million adults, definitely want to emigrate to another country and another 15 percent, or 15 million people, would consider leaving. That totals an incredible 22 million people.

Historically, the mass exodus of people has almost always been the result of repression in their home countries or  because of military, political and economic crises. People ran in all directions during the repression and violence of Ivan the Terrible, the Time of Troubles, the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, the Red Terror and Civil War from 1918 to 1922.

You could add the current political and economic stagnation, cynically presented by government propagandists as the “Putin era of stability,” to this list as millions of Russians are once again seeking refuge abroad.

Vladimir Ryzhkov, a State Duma deputy from 1993 to 2007, hosts a political talk show on Ekho Moskvy radio and is a co-founder of the opposition Party of People’s Freedom.





This article has 3 comments on TheMoscowTimes.com and 0 comments on Facebook.

Leave a comment


Discussion
The Moscow Times welcomes your comments and invites you to discuss topics with other readers. Your comment will be posted automatically to enable a live discussion. If you aren't familiar with our comments policy, you can read it here.

If you're a registered user, you can start typing your comment below. If not, take a moment to sign up. and then return to the article.

If your comment doesn't appear, contact us by using our web form.

Comments



Voting With Your Feet Again

Version:1.0 StartHTML:0000000240 EndHTML:0000007515 StartFragment:0000002423 EndFragment:0000007479 SourceURL:file://localhost/Users/paul/Desktop/Writings/Ltrs%20to%20Moscow%20Times/Ltr%20to%20M:T%20re%20Ryzhkov%20essay%206:20:11.doc @font-face { font-family: "Times New Roman"; }p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal { margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: "Times New Roman"; }table.MsoNormalTable { font-size: 10pt; font-family: "Times New Roman"; }div.Section1 { page: Section1; } The possibility Vladimir Ryzhkov lays before us is intriguing on many counts.  While it is rationally acceptable that Russia needs to embrace radical change to succeed as an economy and as a civil society, it is not so clear what path may be taken toward such change.  For those of us who yearn for such a beneficial upheaval, we may be too willing to interpret signs of discontent as signs of impending sharp movements in the political landscape.  I stand with Mr. Ryzhkov in hoping for some kind of peaceful revolution, which coughs up the old Soviet mindset like a stubborn hairball and once and for all finds new health without having to drag around a thousand years of failed autocratic baggage in an angry gut.  It can happen.  It is within the range of possibilities. But let us first consider what would have to happen to ignite such a tsunami of change.  Right now, the Russian people cannot legally be given a choice, when only Power's chosen, and token, opposition can run.  Any real opposition is also, by law, prevented from identifying itself and mounting a genuinely fair presentation of its platform.  Second, Russians would have to, almost magically, become a people determined to speak to Power in defense of their own collective future.  It would be a veritable psychological rebirth for this to happen, as Russians, by and large, have so far failed to see themselves as responsible for their own future.             On the other hand, change for the better is begrudgingly stepping forward.  The damn holding back and intimidating good sense may break and the country will be flooded with the fruits of ambition.  There are many young people now in Russia's First World who have never had it so good.  Its middle class is fledgling, but growing.  It is Third World Russia that lags behind and cannot catch up without the kinds of change only possible with regional power, under independent courts, which currently Russians don't enjoy.             Regarding a new Russian diaspora, there is one credible explanation for a jump in capital flight and a desire to emigrate that didn't exist in decades past.  We have to admit that the situation in Russia today is not nearly so bad as in 1920 or 1933.  But even without responding to the kind of repression and terror that drove past generations away, Russians, like people world wide, are seeing how the rest of the developed world lives through modern communications technology.  The triumph of the internet coupled with the greater ease of travel to the west has created a new Russian who is more and more aware of the futility of their lives in comparison with the west — and more willing to entertain the idea that, life being short, they would discover much better opportunity living in a sensible environment elsewhere, if it doesn't appear likely to happen in their lifetimes in Russia.  Russians are very aware that Power can have its way for centuries, or so they have been taught by a brutal history.  So the mindset is to accept your fate under an intransigent self-serving power, or leave if you can.  — And they can, or at least now there is hope.                I will keep this essay in my "Russian prophecy" file, and look back on it in 20 years, if I live so long.  Whether sprung upon us in an unpredictable upswelling of sentiment, i.e. a revolution of whatever sort, or simply happening in a grinding process of decades, Russia will almost certainly change.  It is a question of the time it takes to heal a traumatized society, whether by transforming the wounded or by letting unscarred youth succeed to power.  Paul Shelton, Seattle, pgshelton@w-link.net

Voting With Your Feet Again

My oh My OH MY! If I did not know better, I would be thinking that this venomous article was written by a very mad and loudly hissing poisonous snake, sporting a serious pair of super sharp fangs! But of course, Mr. Vladimir Ryzhkov, we all know that it is really and only just little ol' you. But what a ferocious BITE you have; and what DEADLY VENOM you inject into each and every paragraph- into EACH and EVERY LINE! How VERY IMPRESSIVE your TERROR and technigue... FOR a POISONOUS SNAKE! If I was married to a husband who was fool enough to go brashly and foolishly spouting off like you do, first, you would not get any you-know-what; and if you did not knock it off, you would very likely be graced with the backside of my fryin' pan. And WHY would I be so incensed with a husband who is doing what you are doing? Very, VERY simple: instead of being constructive, you are being DEstructive; you are engaging in needless nay-saying, doom-saying, and finally- and perhaps most importantly- your acting like a fool would be EMBARASSING ME to KINGDOM COME! You are Riding a Very Thin Line, Mr. Vladimir Ryzhkov. If I were married to a man who rode that thin line of nearly promoting revolution and treason, I would get a divorce quicker than a cobra can strike. SHAME ON YOU!

Voting With Your Feet Again

P.S. Thankyou, Mr. Paul Shelton, for your very fine, thought-provoking, and informative comments; I sincerely both enjoyed and got more out of your comments than I did from Mr. Vladimir Ryzhkov's article.

Report Inappropriate Comment




Comments via Facebook



Also in Opinion

There's Just One Nationality — Mathematician

Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind."

Russia's New Propaganda Minister

After Monday's announcement that historian Vladimir Medinsky was appointed the culture minister, critics quickly labeled him the new propaganda minister. Medinsky's academic ethics and historical distortions may raise serious questions, but for the Kremlin, he has three important attributes that are much more important: He is a model United Russia leader, a firm Putin loyalist and a skilled sophist.

Spinning Medvedev's Government

Were this 2008 and not 2012 — and had Dmitry Medvedev been named prime minister without having first served a full term as president — then the composition of his new government might have created a generally positive impression.

New Government Faces Old Problems

A longstanding platitude shared by both the Kremlin as well as domestic and foreign analysts is the need for Russia to diversify its economy away from energy dependence and reduce its non-oil budget deficit.

Putin's Postman Delivers Nothing at the G8

In the mid-1990s, former President Boris Yeltsin fought hard for the right to sit as equal at the same table with the leaders of the world's seven leading democracies. Using a lot of political wrangling, Moscow finally secured permanent membership in this elite club where the real heavyweights are supposed to solve the world's most pressing problems.

Russia Stays Home

Just three days before his return to the Kremlin as president, Vladimir Putin met behind closed doors at his residence in Novo-Ogaryovo, outside Moscow, with U.S. National Security Adviser Tom Donilon, who was there to transmit President Barack Obama's renewed determination to strengthen cooperation with Russia.



print


Comments

This article has 3 comments on TheMoscowTimes.com and 0 comments on Facebook.

Leave a comment


To Our Readers

The Moscow Times welcomes letters to the editor. Letters for publication should be signed and bear the signatory's address and telephone number.

Letters to the editor should be sent by fax to (7-495) 232-6529, by e-mail to oped@imedia.ru, or by post. The Moscow Times reserves the right to edit letters.



Most Read
MarketGid