Install

Get the latest updates as we post them — right on your browser

Today's paper. Last Updated: 05/28/2012

Tandem Would Gain If Khodorkovsky Set Free

Russia’s political stars could not be better aligned for the early release of former Yukos owners Mikhail Khodorkovsky and Platon Lebedev from prison.

Both President Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin are looking for ways to disabuse themselves of the political costs that the continued imprisonment of both men presents to their decision on the presidential transition of 2012.

Their respective motives are different, but their equally strong interests in finally putting this nasty matter to rest coincide at this particular moment in Russian history.

Political risks for Putin and Medvedev are minimal. The European Court of Human Rights has just dismissed Khodorkovsky’s suit that his arrest in 2003 was politically motivated.

Although the two men have not admitted their guilt, even if they would be released early on parole, they would still remain on record as convicted criminals, not political prisoners of conscience. And a criminal conviction would make them ineligible for running in an election. Moreover, the conditions of the parole are likely to restrict their active involvement in politics and media exposure.

For Medvedev, the release of the two prisoners would help underline his independent role and strengthen his centerpiece agenda of judicial reform and the creation of a more business-friendly climate. Were he to run for president in 2012, he would no longer have a political albatross around his neck that keeps reminding everyone of his dependency on his senior tandem partner.

For Putin, releasing Khodorkovsky and Lebedev now is equally appealing. This would send a powerful signal at home and abroad that Putin’s return to the Kremlin, were he to opt for it, would be nothing to fear. In an instant, it would help defang his liberal and Western critics and would allow him to enter the presidential race without the political baggage of his earlier rule and win new friends in the West.

Since this would be a purely legal decision taken on Medvedev’s watch, Putin would save face and incur no political cost. If he wanted to play dirty, he could even disavow the release as Medvedev’s pandering to the oligarchs, liberals and the West. For Putin, this would be a show of uncontested, almost royal primacy, not weakness.

Irrespective of the political factors at play, it would be better — not only for Khodorkovsky and Lebedev and their families, but for the country at large — if both men were set free.

Vladimir Frolov is president of LEFF Group, a government-relations and PR company.





This article has 1 comment on TheMoscowTimes.com and 0 comments on Facebook.

Leave a comment


Discussion
The Moscow Times welcomes your comments and invites you to discuss topics with other readers. Your comment will be posted automatically to enable a live discussion. If you aren't familiar with our comments policy, you can read it here.

If you're a registered user, you can start typing your comment below. If not, take a moment to sign up. and then return to the article.

If your comment doesn't appear, contact us by using our web form.

Comments



Tandem Would Gain If Khodorkovsky Set Free

Thankyou Mr. Vladimir Frolov for your most interesting public relations analysis. It must be said that when it is expedient for true justice to be served, whether it be the incarceration of the guilty, the freeing of the innocent, or the timely freeing of those who have served enough time for their crime(s), it should always be done forthwith; political expediency should always be a secondary, though NEVER a primary, consideration.

Report Inappropriate Comment




Comments via Facebook



Also in Opinion

There's Just One Nationality — Mathematician

Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind."

Russia's New Propaganda Minister

After Monday's announcement that historian Vladimir Medinsky was appointed the culture minister, critics quickly labeled him the new propaganda minister. Medinsky's academic ethics and historical distortions may raise serious questions, but for the Kremlin, he has three important attributes that are much more important: He is a model United Russia leader, a firm Putin loyalist and a skilled sophist.

Spinning Medvedev's Government

Were this 2008 and not 2012 — and had Dmitry Medvedev been named prime minister without having first served a full term as president — then the composition of his new government might have created a generally positive impression.

New Government Faces Old Problems

A longstanding platitude shared by both the Kremlin as well as domestic and foreign analysts is the need for Russia to diversify its economy away from energy dependence and reduce its non-oil budget deficit.

Putin's Postman Delivers Nothing at the G8

In the mid-1990s, former President Boris Yeltsin fought hard for the right to sit as equal at the same table with the leaders of the world's seven leading democracies. Using a lot of political wrangling, Moscow finally secured permanent membership in this elite club where the real heavyweights are supposed to solve the world's most pressing problems.

Russia Stays Home

Just three days before his return to the Kremlin as president, Vladimir Putin met behind closed doors at his residence in Novo-Ogaryovo, outside Moscow, with U.S. National Security Adviser Tom Donilon, who was there to transmit President Barack Obama's renewed determination to strengthen cooperation with Russia.



print


Comments

This article has 1 comment on TheMoscowTimes.com and 0 comments on Facebook.

Leave a comment


To Our Readers

The Moscow Times welcomes letters to the editor. Letters for publication should be signed and bear the signatory's address and telephone number.

Letters to the editor should be sent by fax to (7-495) 232-6529, by e-mail to oped@imedia.ru, or by post. The Moscow Times reserves the right to edit letters.



Most Read
MarketGid