Install

Get the latest updates as we post them — right on your browser

Today's paper. Last Updated: 02/10/2012

Medvedev-Putin 2012 Race Would Be Tight

It was probably not Prime Minister Vladimir Putin’s intention to launch a fierce presidential battle for 2012 more than two years ahead of schedule. But that might be the unintended outcome of his casual comment at the meeting with members of the Valdai Club that he and President Dmitry Medvedev would “figure it out between ourselves who of us would run in 2012.”

Putin’s statement was a deliberate put-down of Medvedev on Sept. 11, a day after the president posted his “Go Russia!” appeal in which he criticized the order of business that had ossified under Putin’s rule.

Putin’s remark was an unsubtle hint at Medvedev’s limited capacity to make decisions on matters as crucial for him as running for a second term. To imply this a week before Medvedev’s visit to the United Nations General Assembly and a Group of 20 meeting in Pittsburgh, was to undercut Medvedev’s international credibility. It was a blow to Russia’s image that no amount of schmoozing with members of the Valdai Club could rectify.

Putin left Medvedev no other option but to rush out with a public statement of his own — also made before a foreign audience (clearly, foreigners need to know first) — that he intends to run again in 2012, although this was said tongue-in-cheek.

Putin’s remark mobilized Medvedev’s supporters, like Igor Yurgens, head of the Institute of Contemporary Development, to launch a public campaign to discourage Putin from running in 2012. Yurgens said Putin would look like Leonid Brezhnev if he were to run for president in 2012 and again in 2018, when Putin will be 66.

Despite assurances of political and personal closeness between Putin and Medvedev, they already have ideologically diverging teams who would hate to see their boss yield the right of way.

In 2012 we might see a truly competitive race with a clear choice in strategy for Russia if both of them ran for the presidency. Putin is already in full campaign mode with public events and policy decisions geared to shore up his electoral ratings. Medvedev is busy building his own support base and projecting the image of the nation’s modernizer and an agent of change. Unlike Putin, he still lacks a political party he can call home.

2012 is shaping up as an electoral battle of the giants and another watershed year for Russia.

Vladimir Frolov is president of LEFF Group, a government-relations and PR company.


Also in Opinion

Putin Chasing Imaginary American Ghosts

Here we go again — another round of anti-Americanism from the Kremlin and state-controlled media. We have heard claims that the United States is trying to orchestrate an Orange Revolution in Russia many times before, but it was never this intense.

Putting Everything In Its Place

Remember how I drove you all nuts with the innate propensity of Russian creatures and inanimate objects to stand, sit or lie? And how relieved you were when I moved on to other topics?
Well, I'm back.

Russia Gets Bad Rap Over Syria

As the violent standoff between Syria's security forces and armed opposition groups roils the country, the crisis has opened heated divisions at the United Nations Security Council.

A Propaganda Breakdown

Propaganda is not as powerful as many think. You might convince Russians that people in Egypt, Italy and Ukraine are paid or otherwise persuaded to join street protests, but you certainly cannot convince them that their own dissatisfaction with the government is the result of a foreign conspiracy.

Violent Reaction to Protests Could Bury Putin

Nonviolent revolutions do not always remain nonviolent, as the examples of uprisings in Egypt, Libya and Syria in the Arab Spring have shown. But peaceful movements for regime change often do succeed. For example, they have toppled illegitimate rulers, as with the post-Soviet Color Revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine, and ended apartheid in South Africa.

Realpolitik Without Realism

People have been asking me all week why the Kremlin is so stubbornly supportive of Syrian President Bashar Assad. "Is Russia's support based solely on weapons contracts with Syria," they wonder, "or the Kremlin's desire to maintain its naval base at the Tartus port?"




Discussion
The Moscow Times welcomes your comments and invites you to discuss topics with other readers. Your comment will be posted automatically to enable a live discussion. If you aren't familiar with our comments policy, you can read it here.

If you're a registered user, you can start typing your comment below. If not, take a moment to sign up. and then return to the article.

If your comment doesn't appear, contact us by using our web form.

Comments

Comments via Facebook

print


Comments

This article has no comments.

Be the first to leave a comment



To Our Readers

The Moscow Times welcomes letters to the editor. Letters for publication should be signed and bear the signatory's address and telephone number.

Letters to the editor should be sent by fax to (7-495) 232-6529, by e-mail to oped@imedia.ru, or by post. The Moscow Times reserves the right to edit letters.



Most Read