Perhaps the weight of those centuries, their heavy heritage, could not be shed so easily. Perhaps, too, the suspicions of the West, its reluctance to endorse Yeltsin and provide badly needed financial support, helped create the current morass.
But there were moments when Yeltsin, despite all this, could have seized the initiative to prevent the development of the present intolerable situation: a vice president who openly disavows the president with whom he was elected to serve; a prime minister, disavowed by the legislature, who insists he will keep on working; a week of debates on amendments to the constitution of a country (the Russian Soviet Federal Socialist Republic) that no longer exists; a president so weak that he feels compelled to appeal to the people to choose between the Congress and himself.
Yeltsin is now reaping the consequences of his failure to dissolve the Congress and hold a constituent assembly when this was still an option. He could have done so after the coup last year on the grounds that the new situation demanded new elections and a new constitution. But instead, at the Fifth Congress in November, he made a deal under which the deputies granted him the special powers they are now taking away.
Again last spring, Yeltsin could have dissolved the Congress. At that stage, four months into the Gaidar "shock therapy" program, Yeltsin still had the support of 60 percent of the population. The Congress wanted Yeltsin to ease up on reform. But instead of forcing the issue, he made backroom deals on personnel changes.
In his dramatic speech at the Congress on Thursday, Yeltsin said he blamed himself "for repeatedly making unjustified concessions for the sake of achieving political consent". Due to his failure to act earlier, his future now hangs in the balance -- as does Russia's and, therefore, the world's.
A Message from The Moscow Times:
Dear readers,
We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."
These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.
We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.
Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.
By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.

Remind me later.