Support The Moscow Times!

Floating Rates Is Better Than Fixing Them

On Sept. 15, Deputy Finance Minister Andrei Klepach, one of the most respected  macroeconomists in Russia, said the Russian ruble exchange rate is overvalued by at least 10 percent. On Friday, Central Bank First Deputy Chairman Alexei Ulyukayev responded: “There is no reason to believe that the ruble is either overvalued or undervalued.”

In fact, it is a complex task to determine whether a particular currency is overvalued. First, it is necessary to reach agreement on indicators for determining a “natural exchange rate” relative to which a currency can be gauged as overvalued or undervalued. The simplest method is to determine the rate according to purchasing power parity. That entails dividing the ruble cost of a fixed “basket of goods” by its cost in dollars. According to calculations made by The Economist this summer, in which that hypothetical basket was filled with a single McDonald’s Big Mac, the ruble really is overvalued by 10 percent.

The statement by Klepach is not worrisome because it points to a serious failure of macroeconomic policy; after all, a 10 percent deviation — albeit hypothetical — from the “natural rate” is not significant. The concern is that Klepach might be trying to push the Central Bank into manipulating the exchange rate in an attempt to make it artificially low.

That could help exporters in the short term. But as we learned in 2008, when the Central Bank maintained a fixed exchange rate too long, holding an artificial rate leaves the government prone to heightened risk if a major element of the economy suddenly shifts — such as the price of oil, in the case of Russia.

Since that time — and after a successful managed devaluation of the ruble in 2009 — the Central Bank has maintained a floating exchange rate. That is the best policy at present because, as Sberbank chief economist Ksenia Yudayeva correctly pointed out last week, recent changes in external conditions have slowed the inflation rate, reducing the need to manage the exchange rate.

Harboring fears about the real importance of Klepach’s statement might be unwarranted. After all, it is far too early to talk about manipulating the exchange rate to benefit Russian businesses. But there is no harm in again pointing out that a floating exchange rate is the more reliable option for now.

Konstantin Sonin is a professor at the New Economic School in Moscow and a columnist for Vedomosti.

The views expressed in opinion pieces do not necessarily reflect the position of The Moscow Times.

… we have a small favor to ask. As you may have heard, The Moscow Times, an independent news source for over 30 years, has been unjustly branded as a "foreign agent" by the Russian government. This blatant attempt to silence our voice is a direct assault on the integrity of journalism and the values we hold dear.

We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. Our commitment to providing accurate and unbiased reporting on Russia remains unshaken. But we need your help to continue our critical mission.

Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and you can be confident that you're making a significant impact every month by supporting open, independent journalism. Thank you.

paiment methods
Not ready to support today?
Remind me later.

Read more