My profile:
Police officers escorting a detained person during a Moscow protest, Monday, May 31.
Image 1 of 3 
Opposition activists said Tuesday that Moscow police officers attacked about two dozen people at and after an unauthorized anti-Kremlin protest, breaking the arm of an activist reporter and manhandling a World War II veteran.
Hundreds of people rallied outside the Mayakovskaya metro station late Monday in defense of their constitutional right to free assembly. Police, who cracked down on the protesters after about an hour, said they detained 152.
Policemen beat at least 23 detainees, including a reporter for Gazeta.ru who will need a costly surgery on his broken arm, at the Zamoskvorechye police station, the opposition web site Kasparov.ru said.
The reporter, Alexander Artemyev, took part in the rally as a member of the Solidarity movement, but his employer will still sue police over his broken arm, Gazeta.ru editor Mikhail Mikhailin told Ekho Moskvy radio.
Police began beating the detainees, who were kept outside the police station, after one of them managed to escape, protester Ilya Kolmanovsky wrote on his blog on Snob.ru.
Vladimir Burtsev, a World War II veteran, posted a YouTube video saying a police officer tore off his ribbon bar after he refused to leave the rally.
Zamoskvorechye police chief Alexander Khavkin denied the beatings, Kasparov.ru reported.
Police said about 500 people took part in the rally, while opposition activists and a Moscow Times reporter who attended the event put the number at closer to 1,000.
The crackdown came two days after Prime Minister Vladimir Putin told a meeting with St. Petersburg intelligentsia that such rallies should be allowed to take place, but without hindering other people. His comments raised hopes that Monday's protest, which was also held in 39 other cities, could be staged peacefully despite a ban from local authorities. But Putin's spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Sunday that the prime minister's words did not offer anyone a license to rally.
"Putin voiced the long-time position of the federal authorities. It is up to regional authorities whether to allow a rally or not," said Tatyana Stanovaya, an analyst with the Center of Political Technologies.
Eduard Limonov, a leader of the Other Russia opposition movement, wrote on his LiveJournal blog that "the beatings were decided before" Putin made his remarks. He said Moscow police chief Vladimir Kolokoltsev and Moscow police chief spokesman Viktor Biryukov had decided "to shun responsibility" for the crackdown by going on vacation a few days before the rally.
The Other Russia will try to convince all detainees to sue, Limonov told Interfax.
City officials banned the rally on Triumfalnaya Ploshchad, saying an authorized pro-Kremlin rally was already scheduled to take place instead.
Preventing unwanted public gatherings by holding official rallies is a well-known tactic. In his 2000 book of interviews, “From the First Person. Conversations with Vladimir Putin,” Putin admitted to using it himself when working in the St. Petersburg administration in the 1990s.
Gennady Gudkov, a senior Just Russia official, said Tuesday that his party planned to introduce a bill in the fall that would make it impossible to ban rallies. He said local authorities abuse their power by trying to prevent rallies and that crackdowns “harm the image of Russia as a democratic country,” Interfax reported.
Opposition Decries Police Violence After Rally
THE SWEDISH OMBUDSMAN ( The only universal Swedish word) CALLING : PLEASE, GIVE ME, PM.PUTIN ...
The right to demonstrate and rally - for or against, what ever you want, is basic in a real democracy. How come Russia isn´t able to cope with this question, smoothly,without big headings in media ? It seems tricky and rather desperate to allow a type of contra-demon-stration, besides the " real one", and then break up the masses with police actions. In Sweden (the little rather inflated, but still guiding nation) you can rally and demonstrate, without permission, if no problems of civil order emerge - but then you´re not assured of a police protection, free of charge.
Two demonstrations in Sweden as a way of exemple, yesterday : 1. A large demonstration against the Israeli illegal armed crack-down at the ship bounded for the Ghaza-strip, where 10 participants were killed. In Stockholm there gathered about 7.000 people, in the city, and then walked to the Israeli embassy, and protested. No violence occured, but a necessary show of emotions. (Violence of course always destroyed the good aims with demonstrations.)
2. A rightwing party, xenophobic in general, in a another town, (not in parliament), was disturbed by a contra-demonstration from the leftists. (There is even some 10 % immigrants living in Sweden.) Some small rioting occurred, and when such things happen, the police had the right to transport rioting people, away from the hot spot, and require some ordinary citybuses, and move them some kilometers from possible confrontation, and just let them go, without conseqeunces.
Yesterday the chairman of the Duma´s foreign committe, (Margelov) was interviewed by the BBC news. He gave som good comments /informations as to my taste, example: as why U.S. deployed their Patriot´s at Kaliningrad in Poland, and why not more to the south, in Poland, but to a question about the democracy i Russia, he answered something like: You must believe(!) us, or verify. (Check and reviews that programme, MT, please) And the Moscow demonstra-tions must fall under this " paragraph."
By the way - now I(!) will make & test a spontaneous demonstration to The Moscow Times editors: Why haven´t you published a word about of the Israeli´s action, condemned by the U.N`s council of security? The hard to grasp country, concerning general democracy and information, that are selfevident rights in most nations... ?