Support The Moscow Times!

Letters to the Editor

In response to “Berezovsky’s Sweet Revenge,” a column by Alexei Pankin on March 16.

Editor,
Isn’t it ironic that Boris Berezovsky has received a judgment against a Russian television station for alleging without grounds that Berezovsky was behind the poisoning death of former security agent Alexander Litvinenko? After all, it was Berezovsky himself who alleged that then-President Vladimir Putin was behind that same poisoning.
In 2007, I compiled a report to the World Congress of the International Federation of Journalists on the media coverage of the Litvinenko case. The Guardian Unlimited quoted Berezovsky as saying, “Vladimir Putin authorized the murder of Alexander Litvinenko.” But there were no substantiating details.
Likewise, The Washington Post reported that upon visiting Litvinenko in the hospital, Berezovsky emerged and claimed that Litvinenko had told him that he was poisoned on “an order from President Putin to kill him.”
But in earlier reports before Berezovsky’s hospital visit, Litvinenko said he was sure that he was poisoned by an Italian named Mario Scaramella.
William Dunkerley
New Britain, Connecticut

In response to “Difficult Task Defining Bandera’s Historic Role,” a comment by Alexander Motyl on March 11.

Editor,
The author’s article is a sugar-coated anti-Russian and Ukrainian nationalist overview with several questionable claims.
Motyl stresses contemporary Russian qualms with World War II-era Galician Ukrainian nationalist leader Stepan Bandera, while downplaying the current opposition to Bandera evident in the Polish and Jewish communities, as well as among many Ukrainians.
The Ukrainian opposition to Bandera brings to mind a comparison omitted in Motyl’s commentary — Confederate General Robert E. Lee during the U.S. Civil War. Like Lee, Bandera is a regional figure. In parts of the U.S. south, Lee is positively viewed in a way that isn’t so evident in other parts of the United States. Bandera’s main base of support is in western Ukraine, especially in the Galician region.
In addition, the support for Stalin in Russia isn’t as great as Motyl suggested. There has been a good deal of opposition among Russians to the planned Stalin billboards on the May 9 Victory Day holiday.? 

Michael Averko
Malverne Park, New York

Sign up for our free weekly newsletter

Our weekly newsletter contains a hand-picked selection of news, features, analysis and more from The Moscow Times. You will receive it in your mailbox every Friday. Never miss the latest news from Russia. Preview
Subscribers agree to the Privacy Policy

A Message from The Moscow Times:

Dear readers,

We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."

These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.

We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.

Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.

By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.

Once
Monthly
Annual
Continue
paiment methods
Not ready to support today?
Remind me later.

Read more