Enjoying ad-free content?
Since July 1, 2024, we have disabled all ads to improve your reading experience.
This commitment costs us $10,000 a month. Your support can help us fill the gap.
Support us
Our journalism is banned in Russia. We need your help to keep providing you with the truth.

The Global Deficit in Trust

In their preoccupation with fiscal deficits, policymakers in developed countries continue to neglect a different, yet critical, shortfall: the trust deficit between advanced and emerging economies when it comes to global governance.

For decades, shareholders from developed countries at the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank used loan conditionality to spur economic reforms — often including contentious fiscal-austerity measures — in the so-called Third World. Through pragmatic, sustained reform efforts, countries like Brazil, China and India turned their economies around to achieve stunning increases in gross domestic product growth — from an average annual rate of 3.5 percent in 1980-94 to 5.5 percent since then.

Developed and developing countries would benefit from better coordination on economic policy. But this requires building more trust.

But although developing countries account for more than half of global GDP growth, advanced countries have yet to admit them to leadership roles that reflect their growing global economic influence.

The failure so far of the U.S. Congress to ratify the IMF reform package agreed to by Group of 20 finance ministers and central-bank governors in 2010 is the latest breach of trust — one that makes the promise of adequate representation for emerging economies seem like a shell game. The U.S. unwillingness or inability to ratify the package, which includes doubling the IMF's funding quota and shifting 6 percent of the new total, together with two directorships, to developing countries, undoubtedly contributed to the decision by the BRICS to establish their own development bank.

In fact, a backlash against Western hegemony in global governance has been brewing for years, with developing countries increasingly turning away from the IMF in favor of creating alternative, regional sources of funding. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations, or ASEAN, together with China, Japan and South Korea, established the Chiang Mai Initiative in 2000, and Latin American countries launched negotiations on the Banco del Sur in 2006.

The accelerating erosion of emerging economies' trust in the Bretton Woods institutions is particularly problematic now, given slow growth and economic weakness in advanced countries. While the world economy is expected to grow by 3.3 percent this year, average annual growth in the advanced countries is expected to be just 1.2 percent.

Developed and developing countries alike would benefit from greater coordination on ­economic policy. While regional groups may obtain some short-run benefits by pursuing narrower interests outside of multilateral channels, neither emerging nor advanced economies can fulfill their long-run potential in an environment characterized by isolationism and a zero-sum mentality in areas like trade and exchange-rate policy.

But policy coordination depends on trust, which requires leaders in advanced nations to keep their promises and offer their developing-country counterparts opportunities for leadership. Instead, developed countries have been taking actions that compromise their legitimacy.

For example, after spending decades encouraging developing countries to integrate their economies into the global market, advanced countries now balk at trade openness. Indeed, despite pledges not to erect trade barriers after the global economic crisis, more than 800 new protectionist measures were introduced from late 2008 through 2010. G8 countries, the supposed champions of the global free-trade agenda that dominates the World Trade Organization, accounted for the lion's share of these measures.

Some question the leadership ability of the BRICS. But many emerging markets are already leading by example on important issues like the need to shift global financial flows from debt toward equity. Mexico, for example, recently adopted the changes in capital requirements for banks, which were recommended by the Third Basel Accord, to reduce leverage and increase stability.

For too long, developed countries have clung to their outsize influence in the international financial institutions, even as their fiscal fitness has dwindled. By ignoring the advice that they so vehemently dispensed to the developing world, they brought the world economy to its knees. Now they refuse to fulfill their promises of global cooperation.

Leaders in developed and developing countries must deepen their commitment to economic reform and integration. But only by giving emerging economies a real voice in global governance — thereby reducing the trust deficit and restoring legitimacy to multilateral institutions — can the global economy reach its potential.

Peter Blair Henry is dean of New York University's Stern School of Business. © Project Syndicate

The views expressed in opinion pieces do not necessarily reflect the position of The Moscow Times.

… we have a small favor to ask. As you may have heard, The Moscow Times, an independent news source for over 30 years, has been unjustly branded as a "foreign agent" by the Russian government. This blatant attempt to silence our voice is a direct assault on the integrity of journalism and the values we hold dear.

We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. Our commitment to providing accurate and unbiased reporting on Russia remains unshaken. But we need your help to continue our critical mission.

Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and you can be confident that you're making a significant impact every month by supporting open, independent journalism. Thank you.

paiment methods
Not ready to support today?
Remind me later.

Read more