Enjoying ad-free content?
Since July 1, 2024, we have disabled all ads to improve your reading experience.
This commitment costs us $10,000 a month. Your support can help us fill the gap.
Support us
Our journalism is banned in Russia. We need your help to keep providing you with the truth.

Arms-Trading Treaty Discussions Continue

UNITED NATIONS — Negotiators on Friday narrowly averted the collapse of talks on a world arms trade treaty to regulate the $55 billion global weapons market, agreeing on ground rules for negotiations, with major players the United States and Russia finding agreement on some points but not on others.

Delegates and advocates for tougher oversight of global arms sales said the agreement set the stage for a month-long conference in July to draft the treaty.

There are divisions over whether human rights should be a mandatory criterion for determining whether governments should permit weapons exports to specific countries.

Brian Wood of Amnesty International said Russia, China and several other arms-exporting nations were "resisting proposals from the overwhelming majority for criteria in the treaty that would stop arms transfers" when there was reason to believe that they could be used for serious human rights violations.

He said Washington also had misgivings and was concerned that human rights criteria would discourage states like Syria, a major purchaser of Russian arms, from joining the treaty.

One diplomat described Syria's 11-month crackdown on pro-democracy demonstrations, which has led to the death of more than 5,400 people according to UN figures, and other Arab Spring uprisings as "the elephant in the room" as delegates ponder ways of halting arms sales to governments that kill their own citizens.

"It was in everyone's minds as we discussed the need for the treaty," a senior Western diplomat said.

There was a long debate about whether decisions at the July drafting conference in New York need to be made unanimously, which would give every country a veto.

The United States, Russia, China, Syria, Iran and others pushing for unanimity have argued that the only way to ensure universal compliance is to get all countries on board. Those who dislike the virtual veto, like Mexico and some European countries, believe it could mean that whatever treaty is agreed on in July — if there is one — will be weak.

In the end, participants at last week's discussions at UN headquarters agreed that decisions at the drafting conference in July would be taken by consensus. A senior U.S. official described the veto as "the nuclear option" — a last resort.

The U.S. official, a leading member of Washington's delegation, said the ability to "block a weak treaty" while protecting U.S. domestic rights to bear arms — a politically sensitive issue in the United States — was agreed on in 2009 and remained a condition for U.S. participation.

There are other areas of disagreement, delegates said. Washington does not want the treaty to cover ammunition, while China and Egypt are among those that want to exclude small arms.

Russia's Defense Ministry hurt the chances of weapons makers to export their goods by questioning their quality, Sergei Chemezov, head of state-run Russian Technologies said Saturday, Bloomberg reported.

Chemezov said the Kazakh defense minister asked him why Kazakhstan should buy tanks from Russia rather than Germany after the Defense Ministry's criticism of the defense industry, Chemezov said at a meeting in Moscow.

Russia plans to spend about 900 billion rubles ($30 billion) on defense procurement this year, Dmitry Rogozin, deputy prime minister, said at the same meeting.

… we have a small favor to ask. As you may have heard, The Moscow Times, an independent news source for over 30 years, has been unjustly branded as a "foreign agent" by the Russian government. This blatant attempt to silence our voice is a direct assault on the integrity of journalism and the values we hold dear.

We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. Our commitment to providing accurate and unbiased reporting on Russia remains unshaken. But we need your help to continue our critical mission.

Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and you can be confident that you're making a significant impact every month by supporting open, independent journalism. Thank you.

paiment methods
Not ready to support today?
Remind me later.

Read more