"We are in preliminary consultations with America after a request from them for our possible involvement in the safe haven process," Ron Redmond, a spokesman for the UN High Commission for Refugees, told a news briefing.
"We believe there may be some legitimate asylum-seekers within the population leaving, but how many we don't know."
The humanitarian agency also said it had not seen any evidence of Cuban asylum-seekers being sent back to their homeland against their will.
Such forced return would violate the 1951 UN convention on refugees, intended to protect people genuinely fearing persecution if sent home. The agency monitors compliance with the pact, which has 123 signatories, including the United States. Cuba is not a signatory.
The agency said it was concerned Cuban asylum-seekers should not be detained unnecessarily. They should be held for only a minimal amount of time, just long enough for the legitimacy of a claim to be properly assessed.
Typically, if the agency signs a memo of understanding with a country on safe havens, its delegates attend and monitor the screening and interviewing of refugees to ensure it is being carried out in adherence with international legal principles. Such safe haven agreements are bilateral.
An agency delegate is accompanying U.S. officials on a trip to possible countries of safe haven including Surinam and Paraguay.
Washington and Havana are locked in a standoff over terms for ending the exodus of Cuban exiles, with the United States willing to discuss immigration but not its trade embargo against the island. Some 16,335 Cubans were intercepted off Florida during August, including 11,810 picked up this week. This tops the 9,513 Cuban migrants rescued for the decade between 1983 and 1993.
A Message from The Moscow Times:
Dear readers,
We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."
These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.
We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.
Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.
By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.
Remind me later.