He also defended Russian oil industry technology and expertise and accused people of seeking to drive down the share price of Komineft, the enterprise that owns the pipeline.
"They simply wanted, and dreamed of, lowering the price of Komineft shares ... (and) of ousting some big American firms from the Timan-Pechora project," he told reporters, without naming those he considered responsible.
Shafranik was referring to a planned production-sharing agreement with a consortium of foreign companies in the Timan-Pechora oil and gas basin, just north of the ruptured pipeline area.
Fuel and Energy Ministry estimates, quoted by Itar-Tass, say 14,000 tons of oil and about 30,000 tons of oil-bearing liquids leaked from the pipeline.
A local environmental group, the Social-Ecological Union, has said 200,000 tons of oil was spilled. The New York Times, quoting the U.S. Department of Energy, has said the leak amounted to 250,000 tons.
Shafranik said efforts had been made to deal with the spill from a corroded pipeline near the town of Usinsk. "I consider the work to have been worthy, but not sufficient," he said.
"This is an average, difficult, unpleasant accident, but it is an accident that can be dealt with by people on the spot whose job it is," he said.
The minister said the fuss kicked up over the spill followed the signing in late September of a memorandum by the Russian and U.S. presidents on the Timan-Pechora project. The project involves the U.S. firms Texaco, Exxon and Amoco, plus Norway's Norsk Hydro.
"The two presidents confirmed the Timan-Pechora project. This is the project of the century, with about $10 billion in investment, and probably companies that very much wanted to be in this project decided to push out competitors," Shafranik said.
"We consider the fuss to be above all because of this."
A Message from The Moscow Times:
Dear readers,
We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."
These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.
We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.
Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.
By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.
Remind me later.