Install

Get the latest updates as we post them — right on your browser

Today's paper. Last Updated: 02/10/2012

When I Say Russia, You Say ...

On June 12, amid the festive revelry of Russia Day, a goodly chunk of the populace may have missed the bell for round two of Rossia television's "Name of Russia" contest, a "grandiose" national project whose odd-sounding title should not obscure its noble aim -- to identify a single individual as the most significant figure in Russian history.

Yes, while you and I were downing shots of festive revelry, the field of candidates in this significance sweepstakes was mercilessly slashed -- from 500 first-round nominees to 50. Gone are 450 greats and not-so-greats, from Archpriest Avvakum to arch-creep Felix Dzerzhinsky. And as the semifinalists start training for round three, it's no more Mr. Nice Guys. All 50 heavyweight contenders, says Rossia, now get "campaign staffs" of Russia's "most prominent politicians, scholars and cultural and religious figures" to whip them (well, their reputations) into shape for this summer's elimination bouts. Come Sept. 1, only 12 survivors will move on to the finals. Gr-r-r-r-r-r.

To some, the appearance of Prime Minister Vladimir Putin with a towel and water bucket in some contender's corner will be a dead giveaway as to the eventual winner. But Putin aside, this is a tough contest to handicap. Seriously, choosing a lone individual to stand for one of the world's great cultures presents a real branding dilemma. While it's easy enough to eliminate some of the 50 -- does anyone really think Fyodor Chaliapin, the hard-drinking "Volga Boatmen" singer and backstage brawler, is a strong candida- ... Hmm, see why this is so difficult?

Indeed, if I were voting in this round, I'd treat it like a classic election in my native Chicago. I'd vote early, often and for several different candidates. And in the spirit of Chicago's legendary smoke-filled rooms, here are a cigar-chomping American's best bets from round two -- the contenders least and most likely to advance to the "Name of Russia" finals. If someone in Vegas or Khimki will take your action, bet the farm against the first five here and double-down on two or three guys in the second group:

(1) Lev Yashin, the famous football goalie. Not a chance. Would Yogi Berra win the American version? (2) Vladimir Dal, the great dictionary compiler. R-i-i-ight. (3) Ivan the Terrible. High name recognition, low approval rating -- probably the "terrible" thing. (4) Grigory Potemkin. Besides the villages -- what? (5) Nicholas II. Short, incompetent, polarizing -- everything you don't want in a national leader. Even America's isn't short.

Now for the sure-thing advancers: (1) Peter the Great. Invented modern Russia -- and see how much better "Great" sounds than "Terrible"? (2) Fyodor Dostoevsky. Three words: Greatest. Novelist. Ever. You still feel guilty about not reading "The Brothers Karamazov," don't you? (3) Leo Tolstoy. Four words: Other. Greatest. Novelist. Ever. You've seen "War and Peace," right? Natasha Rostova is Audrey Hepburn. (4) Alexander Pushkin. The national poet and "our everything" to Russians, but with his African ancestor, as hard to handicap as Barack Obama, who might win big or ... (5) Yury Gagarin. Genuine global hero. The first man in space and a great guy by all accounts. He even read "Amerika" magazine!

There, make yourself a bundle. Meanwhile, political scientists are furiously pondering the significance of all this significance. Is the contest just more fevered pumping of the patriotism well (and cheaper than parading tanks)? Or is the idea to divert attention from the ever-mushrooming cult around the current leader (whichever one he is)? Or is this simply innocent national self-inquiry, a fun way to find out what the Russian in the street might actually answer if a sociologist asked, after wisely stepping off the street, "When I say 'Russia' and 'significant,' who comes to mind? No, besides the current leadership. Relax, take your time. Dum-dee-dum. OK, look: Will you admit to liking anybody besides 'Vova' and 'the new guy'?"

Actually, the likeability and significance of historical figures shouldn't be conflated -- as Americans my age well know. Richard Nixon, whose wildly unpopular presidency has been conservatively characterized as "a crime wave," was nevertheless significant. That said, it also bears noting that insignificance and dislikability can coexist in America's once-mighty: George W. Bush, whom Time magazine recently deemed less influential than comedian Sacha Baron Cohen (aka Borat), is now the president least approved of since the invention of approval ratings. Ouch.

November can't come soon enough, eh? Meanwhile, maybe a U.S. television network should organize a "Name of America" contest. Got any good tips?

Mark H. Teeter teaches English and Russian-American relations in Moscow.

Also in Opinion

Putin Chasing Imaginary American Ghosts

Here we go again — another round of anti-Americanism from the Kremlin and state-controlled media. Blaming outside forces for Russia's woes has a long history in the country. The closer we get to the March 4 presidential election, the more intense the anti-American hysteria becomes.


Putting Everything In Its Place

Remember how I drove you all nuts with the innate propensity of Russian creatures and inanimate objects to stand, sit or lie? And how relieved you were when I moved on to other topics?
Well, I'm back.

Russia Gets Bad Rap Over Syria

As the violent standoff between Syria's security forces and armed opposition groups roils the country, the crisis has opened heated divisions at the United Nations Security Council.

A Propaganda Breakdown

Propaganda is not as powerful as many think. You might convince Russians that people in Egypt, Italy and Ukraine are paid or otherwise persuaded to join street protests, but you certainly cannot convince them that their own dissatisfaction with the government is the result of a foreign conspiracy.

Violent Reaction to Protests Could Bury Putin

Nonviolent revolutions do not always remain nonviolent, as the examples of uprisings in Egypt, Libya and Syria in the Arab Spring have shown. But peaceful movements for regime change often do succeed. For example, they have toppled illegitimate rulers, as with the post-Soviet Color Revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine, and ended apartheid in South Africa.

Realpolitik Without Realism

People have been asking me all week why the Kremlin is so stubbornly supportive of Syrian President Bashar Assad. "Is Russia's support based solely on weapons contracts with Syria," they wonder, "or the Kremlin's desire to maintain its naval base at the Tartus port?"




Discussion
The Moscow Times welcomes your comments and invites you to discuss topics with other readers. Your comment will be posted automatically to enable a live discussion. If you aren't familiar with our comments policy, you can read it here.

If you're a registered user, you can start typing your comment below. If not, take a moment to sign up. and then return to the article.

If your comment doesn't appear, contact us by using our web form.

Comments

Comments via Facebook

print


Comments

This article has no comments.

Be the first to leave a comment



To Our Readers

The Moscow Times welcomes letters to the editor. Letters for publication should be signed and bear the signatory's address and telephone number.

Letters to the editor should be sent by fax to (7-495) 232-6529, by e-mail to oped@imedia.ru, or by post. The Moscow Times reserves the right to edit letters.



Most Read