Install

Get the latest updates as we post them — right on your browser

Today's paper. Last Updated: 02/10/2012

The 2nd Leningrad Affair

The fact that Saturday's congress of Russia's Communist Party was its 13th did not augur well. Superstitious patriots saw in that number something vaguely reminiscent of a Masonic plot -- or at least something deeply disturbing to any true Russian Orthodox believer. With these anxieties hanging over them, party members prepared for their latest congress, crossing themselves and lighting extra candles in the church for protection.

To Our Readers

The Moscow Times welcomes letters to the editor. Letters for publication should be signed and bear the signatory's address and telephone number.
Letters to the editor should be sent by fax to (7-495) 232-6529, by e-mail to oped@imedia.ru, or by post. The Moscow Times reserves the right to edit letters.

Email the Opinion Page Editor

But there was another, more serious cause for concern. The St. Petersburg branch of the party was hit with a big scandal. It seemed the they had chosen the wrong delegates to attend the St. Petersburg congress, and to make matters worse they elected Vladimir Fyodorov as their local leader.

The main problem with Fyodorov was that throughout his party career he had not battled fiercely enough against one of the Communists' main enemies -- the Zionist and Masonic conspirators. In addition, he was far too reserved in renouncing Marx. Although during the Soviet era Marx had generally been recognized as one of the "founding fathers" of communism, the post-Soviet Communist Party has taken an active stance of denouncing Marx -- mainly because of his Jewish roots.

The leading "patriotic" Communist in St. Petersburg, Yury Belov, received only 40 percent of the vote in the election for head of the local party branch, but he refused to admit defeat. On the instructions of the party's presidium, a Moscow delegation was dispatched to St. Petersburg to put an end to the latest ideological deviations and breakdown in party discipline.

What was the result? The renegade, "anti-patriotic" faction was immediately purged when it lost its delegates and leader. The event was immediately termed "The Second Leningrad Affair," referring to Stalin's purges of that city in the 1940s.

Some party supporters and even functionaries felt the Communist leadership went too far this time. It is one thing when members disseminate "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" on the street or when they invite leaders of the ultranationalist Movement Against Illegal Immigration to May Day celebrations as brothers-in-arms. But it is quite another thing to destroy one of the most important branches of the party.

Communist Party presidium member Boris Kashin spoke for the opposing faction when he said, "Any attempt by the party to impose its decisions from above should be unequivocally condemned. To the credit of most regional party organizations, this unauthorized campaign has failed, although it has managed to damage the party's authority." Some regional branches of the Communist Party (in Karelia for example) denounced the actions of the Moscow leadership -- not so much on ideological grounds as out of fear that they could set a negative precedent.

Even with all of these problems, the patriots within the St. Petersburg branch of the Communist Party took up a worthwhile cause: convincing the Russian Orthodox Church to canonize Stalin. It's a shame the Orthodox hierarchy has not given the proper attention to this proposal.

The 13th Communist Party congress ended as any major party event should. Accompanied by enthusiastic applause, Gennady Zyuganov was once again re-elected to the top leadership position. Presidium members who had dared to side with their St. Petersburg renegade colleagues in the dispute were demoted, while Belov's zeal was rewarded by being appointed to the Central Committee.

Only one question remains unanswered: What will the party leadership do once it has purged all its branch organizations by kicking out every member who disagrees with the party line?

Boris Kagarlitsky is the director of the Institute of Globalization Studies.

Also in Opinion

Putin Chasing Imaginary American Ghosts

Here we go again — another round of anti-Americanism from the Kremlin and state-controlled media. Blaming outside forces for Russia's woes has a long history in the country. The closer we get to the March 4 presidential election, the more intense the anti-American hysteria becomes.


Putting Everything In Its Place

Remember how I drove you all nuts with the innate propensity of Russian creatures and inanimate objects to stand, sit or lie? And how relieved you were when I moved on to other topics?
Well, I'm back.

Russia Gets Bad Rap Over Syria

As the violent standoff between Syria's security forces and armed opposition groups roils the country, the crisis has opened heated divisions at the United Nations Security Council.

A Propaganda Breakdown

Propaganda is not as powerful as many think. You might convince Russians that people in Egypt, Italy and Ukraine are paid or otherwise persuaded to join street protests, but you certainly cannot convince them that their own dissatisfaction with the government is the result of a foreign conspiracy.

Violent Reaction to Protests Could Bury Putin

Nonviolent revolutions do not always remain nonviolent, as the examples of uprisings in Egypt, Libya and Syria in the Arab Spring have shown. But peaceful movements for regime change often do succeed. For example, they have toppled illegitimate rulers, as with the post-Soviet Color Revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine, and ended apartheid in South Africa.

Realpolitik Without Realism

People have been asking me all week why the Kremlin is so stubbornly supportive of Syrian President Bashar Assad. "Is Russia's support based solely on weapons contracts with Syria," they wonder, "or the Kremlin's desire to maintain its naval base at the Tartus port?"




Discussion
The Moscow Times welcomes your comments and invites you to discuss topics with other readers. Your comment will be posted automatically to enable a live discussion. If you aren't familiar with our comments policy, you can read it here.

If you're a registered user, you can start typing your comment below. If not, take a moment to sign up. and then return to the article.

If your comment doesn't appear, contact us by using our web form.

Comments

Comments via Facebook

print


Comments

This article has no comments.

Be the first to leave a comment



To Our Readers

The Moscow Times welcomes letters to the editor. Letters for publication should be signed and bear the signatory's address and telephone number.

Letters to the editor should be sent by fax to (7-495) 232-6529, by e-mail to oped@imedia.ru, or by post. The Moscow Times reserves the right to edit letters.



Most Read