Install

Get the latest updates as we post them — right on your browser

Today's paper. Last Updated: 02/10/2012

Political Upset Required For Big Economic Shift

I honestly do not believe today’s talk about modernization. Or more exactly, I believe only the part where leaders say modernization is necessary. But once the discussion turns to what practical steps must be taken, I don’t believe it anymore. This is not because proposals to privatize major companies and eliminate state-owned corporations wouldn’t work. Those are very sensible measures. The reason is simply that true modernization never succeeds without a corresponding major change in political leadership.

One area that is crying out to be modernized is the economy, which is too reliant on oil.

In the fourth chapter of the Transition Report 2009, issued by the European Bank of Reconstruction and Development, which details diversification efforts by governments of countries with transitional economies, a comparison is made between Russian exports during two different five-month periods — from December 2004 to April 2005, and from December 2008 to April 2009. During the first period, the price of oil averaged $42 per barrel, and in the second, $43 per barrel. In the 2004-05 fiscal year, oil and gas accounted for 43.5 percent of all Russian exports, and goods with a high value-added margin represented 5.9 percent. Four years later, in the 2008-09 fiscal year, oil and gas sales accounted for 44 percent of all exports, and goods with a high value-added margin — that is, the very sector that should increase in order to diversify the economy — remained almost the same at 6.2 percent. In short, nothing changed. (Yet even that lack of improvement looks like a success compared to Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan, two countries with transitional economies and significant oil exports that suffered significant declines in diversification over the last five years.) The structure of Russia’s gross domestic product also fails to reveal any signs of diversification.

So what does that give us? Diversification — one of the main requirements for modernization — remains unchanged, and there are no new ways of solving that task that are immediately evident. The government remains essentially unchanged as well. In such a situation, Russians might heed the wisdom of the old saying, “It is easier to have new children than to clean the old dirty ones.”

Konstantin Sonin, a visiting professor at the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University, is a professor at the New Economic School in Moscow and a columnist for Vedomosti.




Tags

modernization



Also in Opinion

Putin Chasing Imaginary American Ghosts

Here we go again — another round of anti-Americanism from the Kremlin and state-controlled media. Blaming outside forces for Russia's woes has a long history in the country. The closer we get to the March 4 presidential election, the more intense the anti-American hysteria becomes.


Putting Everything In Its Place

Remember how I drove you all nuts with the innate propensity of Russian creatures and inanimate objects to stand, sit or lie? And how relieved you were when I moved on to other topics?
Well, I'm back.

Russia Gets Bad Rap Over Syria

As the violent standoff between Syria's security forces and armed opposition groups roils the country, the crisis has opened heated divisions at the United Nations Security Council.

A Propaganda Breakdown

Propaganda is not as powerful as many think. You might convince Russians that people in Egypt, Italy and Ukraine are paid or otherwise persuaded to join street protests, but you certainly cannot convince them that their own dissatisfaction with the government is the result of a foreign conspiracy.

Violent Reaction to Protests Could Bury Putin

Nonviolent revolutions do not always remain nonviolent, as the examples of uprisings in Egypt, Libya and Syria in the Arab Spring have shown. But peaceful movements for regime change often do succeed. For example, they have toppled illegitimate rulers, as with the post-Soviet Color Revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine, and ended apartheid in South Africa.

Realpolitik Without Realism

People have been asking me all week why the Kremlin is so stubbornly supportive of Syrian President Bashar Assad. "Is Russia's support based solely on weapons contracts with Syria," they wonder, "or the Kremlin's desire to maintain its naval base at the Tartus port?"




Discussion
The Moscow Times welcomes your comments and invites you to discuss topics with other readers. Your comment will be posted automatically to enable a live discussion. If you aren't familiar with our comments policy, you can read it here.

If you're a registered user, you can start typing your comment below. If not, take a moment to sign up. and then return to the article.

If your comment doesn't appear, contact us by using our web form.

Comments

Comments via Facebook

print


Comments

This article has no comments.

Be the first to leave a comment



To Our Readers

The Moscow Times welcomes letters to the editor. Letters for publication should be signed and bear the signatory's address and telephone number.

Letters to the editor should be sent by fax to (7-495) 232-6529, by e-mail to oped@imedia.ru, or by post. The Moscow Times reserves the right to edit letters.



Most Read