Install

Get the latest updates as we post them — right on your browser

Today's paper. Last Updated: 02/10/2012

Moscow Smart to Take A New Look at Tehran

Vedomosti

By all indications, Russia is prepared to support sanctions against Iran. Perhaps this is a way of returning a favor to U.S. President Barack Obama for his decision to scrap the missile defense shield intended for Poland and the Czech Republic.

But there are other reasons behind the Kremlin’s decision to change its position on sanctions. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, Moscow always blocked sanctions against Iran. Moscow’s $1 billion contract to help build the Bushehr nuclear reactor supported Russia’s high-tech sector during difficult economic times. Moreover, Iran was ruled during that time by Mohammed Khatami, a moderate who did not threaten his neighbors with military attacks. But after the radical Islamic President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad came to power in 2005, Moscow’s former support of Tehran raised several questions.

The argument that the Kremlin held Iran as its trump card to spite the United States does not hold water. In fact, the opposite is true: Iran took advantage of Russia by leveraging the Bushehr project against the Kremlin’s steady support for Iran in the United Nations. Moreover, Tehran refused to sign the agreement with Russia, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan on the demarcation of the Caspian Sea. At the same time, Iran strengthened its armed forces, particularly its missile capabilities, largely thanks to Russian technology and weapons systems.

Iran does not yet have long-range missiles capable of reaching the United States or Europe, but it does have medium-range missiles, such as the Shahab-3, that can reach Russia’s North Caucasus and the Astrakhan region, as well as Kazakhstan and Armenia, Russia’s allies in the Collective Security Treaty Organization.

The argument that Russia’s support of Iran in its ongoing confrontation with the United States gave the Kremlin clout in the Muslim world is also weak. Iran’s missile and nuclear programs are a direct threat to Moscow’s allies in the Middle East. It was no coincidence that Iran’s nuclear program was question No. 1 during the recent meeting between Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and the secretary-general of the Arab League, Amr Moussa, and Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu.

Most surprising of all, it took a “reset” in U.S.-Russian relations to finally convince the Kremlin that it needs to keep a safe distance from the highly unpredictable and unstable Iranian regime that is located so close to Russia’s borders.

This comment appeared as an editorial in Vedomosti.


Also in Opinion

Putin Chasing Imaginary American Ghosts

Here we go again — another round of anti-Americanism from the Kremlin and state-controlled media. Blaming outside forces for Russia's woes has a long history in the country. The closer we get to the March 4 presidential election, the more intense the anti-American hysteria becomes.


Putting Everything In Its Place

Remember how I drove you all nuts with the innate propensity of Russian creatures and inanimate objects to stand, sit or lie? And how relieved you were when I moved on to other topics?
Well, I'm back.

Russia Gets Bad Rap Over Syria

As the violent standoff between Syria's security forces and armed opposition groups roils the country, the crisis has opened heated divisions at the United Nations Security Council.

A Propaganda Breakdown

Propaganda is not as powerful as many think. You might convince Russians that people in Egypt, Italy and Ukraine are paid or otherwise persuaded to join street protests, but you certainly cannot convince them that their own dissatisfaction with the government is the result of a foreign conspiracy.

Violent Reaction to Protests Could Bury Putin

Nonviolent revolutions do not always remain nonviolent, as the examples of uprisings in Egypt, Libya and Syria in the Arab Spring have shown. But peaceful movements for regime change often do succeed. For example, they have toppled illegitimate rulers, as with the post-Soviet Color Revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine, and ended apartheid in South Africa.

Realpolitik Without Realism

People have been asking me all week why the Kremlin is so stubbornly supportive of Syrian President Bashar Assad. "Is Russia's support based solely on weapons contracts with Syria," they wonder, "or the Kremlin's desire to maintain its naval base at the Tartus port?"




Discussion
The Moscow Times welcomes your comments and invites you to discuss topics with other readers. Your comment will be posted automatically to enable a live discussion. If you aren't familiar with our comments policy, you can read it here.

If you're a registered user, you can start typing your comment below. If not, take a moment to sign up. and then return to the article.

If your comment doesn't appear, contact us by using our web form.

Comments

Comments via Facebook

print


Comments

This article has no comments.

Be the first to leave a comment



To Our Readers

The Moscow Times welcomes letters to the editor. Letters for publication should be signed and bear the signatory's address and telephone number.

Letters to the editor should be sent by fax to (7-495) 232-6529, by e-mail to oped@imedia.ru, or by post. The Moscow Times reserves the right to edit letters.



Most Read