Install

Get the latest updates as we post them — right on your browser

Today's paper. Last Updated: 02/10/2012

Army’s Need for Enema Bag

Russia’s military top brass have an old trick that is so effective it never ceases to amaze me. The moment things start going badly for the army, they convince political leaders of the existence of a miracle formula that can magically turn the situation around. As soon as problems arise in the armed forces, the generals announce that everything will improve just as soon as they receive the new military doctrine. And when talk turns to a decline in discipline, the top brass immediately propose creating a military police force. For the past 20 years, this has happened every time a high-profile crime has been committed by military personnel. And once the public uproar blows over, everyone forgets the military police force.

But now, Interfax, citing an unidentified Defense Ministry source, reports that a military police force will be formed next year to prevent all violations of discipline, including the notorious problem of hazing. A special military department dealing with the new force will be established as early as December — even though there has been no widely publicized crime in the military recently. I suspect that Defense Ministry officials are just trying to stay ahead of the game. A few months back, generals made the risky decision to have enlisted men and contract soldiers serve together in the same units. Considering that many contract soldiers started out as short-term enlisted men but were tricked or forced into signing three-year contracts of duty, it is not difficult to imagine that they will be releasing all of their pent-up anger on the fresh crop of enlistees who, according to the new rules, must serve for only 12 months.

Whatever the reason behind it, the creation of a military police force is once again on the agenda. Debating whether the armed forces need a police force is a little like asking if a doctor needs to own an enema bag. Of course he does. But imagine the tragedy if he were to try to treat every single illness with it. The same thing can be said of a military police force. It can be a highly effective tool for maintaining order in the army but only if it is a part — albeit, a very important one — of the overall law enforcement system. That system assumes that most people are law abiding and not interested in committing crimes. A current argument about whether the proposed military police force should answer to the Defense Ministry or to the Prosecutor General’s Office seems somewhat superfluous as a result.

It is more important to understand that the impossibility of creating a proper military police force when civilian police have essentially organized themselves into armed gangs who use their guns and badges as a license for extortion. If that practice carries over into the military — and there is no reason to believe that it won’t —every military police officer of every rank will start running a racket.

It also will be impossible to create a proper military police force when the very thing that could maintain discipline in the ranks is effectively absent from the Russian army — the institution of noncommissioned officers. How can an effective military police force be established when most officers are more worried about whether they will be given apartments, money or nothing at all when they retire than about preparing soldiers for battle?

Also, it will be necessary to train the military policemen in special academies that inculcate an unwavering respect for the law.

In short, the conditions in which a military police force might do at least some good simply don’t exist in Russia — not in the government, not in the army and not in society. It would be better if the force were planned for a future date when a special military police academy could be created at the same time as a professional corps of noncommissioned officers, trained at the renowned Airborne Troops Academy in Ryazan, could be established. Soldiers could be trained together with lieutenants who have graduated from one of the 10 scientific-academic centers, cultivating a new type of officer.

But if anyone believes that pinning police badges on 5,000 inadequately trained soldiers will increase discipline in the armed forces, they are sorely mistaken. And, of course, any police force will only have meaning as long as Defense Ministry officials have no hidden agenda to discredit the whole idea before it even gets started.

Alexander Golts is deputy editor of the online newspaper Yezhednevny Zhurnal.




Tags

armed forces defense ministry



Also in Opinion

Putin Chasing Imaginary American Ghosts

Here we go again — another round of anti-Americanism from the Kremlin and state-controlled media. Blaming outside forces for Russia's woes has a long history in the country. The closer we get to the March 4 presidential election, the more intense the anti-American hysteria becomes.


Putting Everything In Its Place

Remember how I drove you all nuts with the innate propensity of Russian creatures and inanimate objects to stand, sit or lie? And how relieved you were when I moved on to other topics?
Well, I'm back.

Russia Gets Bad Rap Over Syria

As the violent standoff between Syria's security forces and armed opposition groups roils the country, the crisis has opened heated divisions at the United Nations Security Council.

A Propaganda Breakdown

Propaganda is not as powerful as many think. You might convince Russians that people in Egypt, Italy and Ukraine are paid or otherwise persuaded to join street protests, but you certainly cannot convince them that their own dissatisfaction with the government is the result of a foreign conspiracy.

Violent Reaction to Protests Could Bury Putin

Nonviolent revolutions do not always remain nonviolent, as the examples of uprisings in Egypt, Libya and Syria in the Arab Spring have shown. But peaceful movements for regime change often do succeed. For example, they have toppled illegitimate rulers, as with the post-Soviet Color Revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine, and ended apartheid in South Africa.

Realpolitik Without Realism

People have been asking me all week why the Kremlin is so stubbornly supportive of Syrian President Bashar Assad. "Is Russia's support based solely on weapons contracts with Syria," they wonder, "or the Kremlin's desire to maintain its naval base at the Tartus port?"




Discussion
The Moscow Times welcomes your comments and invites you to discuss topics with other readers. Your comment will be posted automatically to enable a live discussion. If you aren't familiar with our comments policy, you can read it here.

If you're a registered user, you can start typing your comment below. If not, take a moment to sign up. and then return to the article.

If your comment doesn't appear, contact us by using our web form.

Comments



Giles Cattermole

"…… asking if a doctor needs to own an enema bag. Of course he does."  It is the little, throw-away comments that reveal more than the subject. Here in the UK I have many doctor acquaintances.  None of them can recall having or having used an enema bag.  They are regarded as largely obsolete. The articles tells us more about Russian medicine than the Russian military.


Report Inappropriate Comment




Comments via Facebook

print


Comments

This article has 1 comment on TheMoscowTimes.com and 0 comments on Facebook.

Leave a comment


To Our Readers

The Moscow Times welcomes letters to the editor. Letters for publication should be signed and bear the signatory's address and telephone number.

Letters to the editor should be sent by fax to (7-495) 232-6529, by e-mail to oped@imedia.ru, or by post. The Moscow Times reserves the right to edit letters.



Most Read