Support The Moscow Times!

Banks Are For Banking

Should Russia stop its banks from swallowing up industry at all?


Once again, there is a historical parallel in America. In the wake of the Wall Street crash, the government moved to separate the stock market from the money market. The crash had left some 40 percent of the nation's commercial banks bankrupt and many regional governors had closed banks altogether. The Glass-Steagall Act which followed prevented banks from investing so heavily in potentially illiquid equities that they would be unable to meet their liabilities when depositors asked.


The Glass-Steagall legislation was crucial in helping savers regain their confidence in banks. "It helped restore confidence in a totally discredited financial system," said Daniel Yergin, author of "The Prize," an analysis of the development of the oil industry. "It helped reduce the likelihood of crisis and promoted financial liquidity."


Glass-Steagall strengthened the division between investment and commercial banking erected by the original Banking Act legislation of the 1860s. Although Wall Street banks have widely got round the legislation, the banks are only now in the process of officially undoing the Glass-Steagall straitjacket.


With today's prognoses that Russia's banking industry faces a massive crunch, some believe a version of Glass-Steagall might be appropriate here too. For the heavy investment of several of the banks which are busy building up FIGs could soon leave them high and dry if there was a run on the bank. Only a handful of Russian banks have a deep enough capital base to manage long-term investments.


"It may well be that we need a clear distinction between investment banking and commercial banking," said Pyotr Aven, president of Alfa-Bank, conceding that large illiquid equity holdings by banks are dangerous in Russia's fragile financial environment.


As in anti-trust legislation, the question facing Russian legislators today is not so much whether the country currently needs Glass-Steagall legislation, but whether such a ruling could be implemented. Russia's financial whiz-kids are every bit as innovative as their Wall Street counterparts -- strings of derivatives can quite simply be constructed which circumvent regulations on equity holding. The whole idea behind Glass-Steagall could well be redundant in today's fiber-optic financial reality.


"Even if Glass-Steagall cannot effectively be implemented, Russia needs walls between lending and underwriting," said Yergin. "Russia, like any other market system, needs rules if it is going to be successful over any period."

Sign up for our free weekly newsletter

Our weekly newsletter contains a hand-picked selection of news, features, analysis and more from The Moscow Times. You will receive it in your mailbox every Friday. Never miss the latest news from Russia. Preview
Subscribers agree to the Privacy Policy

A Message from The Moscow Times:

Dear readers,

We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."

These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.

We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.

Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.

By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.

Once
Monthly
Annual
Continue
paiment methods
Not ready to support today?
Remind me later.

Read more