Legislation prohibiting the arrest of businessmen won't help many of them, as courts are refusing to acknowledge that some suspects were engaged in entrepreneurial activity.
Vedomosti has obtained a copy of the Tverskoi District Court's decision extending the arrest of Alexander Volkov, director of Eurasia Logistics, who was accused of fraud and property laundering, as well as document forgery committed as part of an organized group. The Interior Ministry's Investigative Committee said that in 2006-08, Eurasia helped Mukhtar Ablyazov, former head of BTA-Bank, take out loans he never intended to return.
Volkov was arrested in March, along with three other Eurasia Logistics employers. But in April, a law backed by President Dmitry Medvedev was enacted prohibiting arrest for economic crimes, including fraud charges, if the fraud was related to entrepreneurial activity.
But Volkov was not released from custody. On April 30, the court extended his arrest until September. The judge, Sergei Podoprigorov, who also ordered the arrest of Sergei Magnitsky — a lawyer who died in pretrial detention in November — decided that the circumstances mandating Volkov's arrest had not changed and that his charges were criminal, not economic. A court decision extending the arrest of Denis Vorotyntsev, a lawyer for Eurasia Logistics, explained that the crimes in question were committed with the intent to create a Ponzi scheme, the goal of which was obtaining loans, not real entrepreneurial work.
Interpreting the law this way will allow courts to ignore the ban on arrests of businessmen — all they need to do is claim that the crime is not related to entrepreneurship, Volkov's lawyer Yelena Oreshnikova said. In Volkov's case, the court ignored the fact that the credits were invested in real estate projects, she said.
Anna Usachyova, spokeswoman for the Moscow City Court, refused to comment on the decision of the Tverskoi court.
Taking out loans meets the definition of “entrepreneurial activity,” but the problem is that judges never refuse requests from prosecutors and investigators, said Yury Kostanov, a lawyer, adding that there was a reason why judges, as well as corrupt police officers, were accused by the U.S. Congress of oppressing Magnitsky.
The legislation has led to the release of Boris Sokalsky, chairman of the board of NEP Bank, accused of illegal banking, and Alexander Gitelson, owner of VEFK Bank, charged with extra-large-scale embezzlement and money laundering. The Investigative Committee closed the case against Mikhail Gutseriyev for a lack of evidence of wrongdoing, and the Investigative Committee under the Prosecutor General's Office dropped charges against Igor Linshits, former owner of Neftyanoi Bank, for the same reasons.
Supreme Court Chairman Vyacheslav Lebedev said no data on the effect of the arrest ban for entrepreneurs is presently available, but the Supreme Court has already requested that local courts provide statistics on the issue. Lebedev said he does not expect a lot of cases to fall under the new law.
Custody decisions are usually changed on appeal. The Moscow City Court on Monday canceled the decision of the Basmanny District Court, which on April 15 extended the arrest of Natalya Grishkevich, a department manager of the Pension Fund arrested in a graft case, and released her on 7 million rubles ($231,000) bail. Last week it overturned the ruling of the Tverskoi court, which refused to release Andrei Kagramanov, arrested on charges of illegal banking, citing recent law changes for this decision.
But these are isolated cases, said Robert Zinovyev, a lawyer. The court administration has already given the judges informal instructions not to acknowledge the entrepreneurial nature of activities for suspects who need to be arrested, he said.
Judges are also reluctant to refuse arrest warrants because they are afraid of losing their jobs without severance pay. Magistrates face strict punishment for releasing suspects: Three judges received formal warnings in September for granting bail to Yekaterina Leladze, a defendant in the Tri Kita case. Lyubov Rumyantsev, an ex-judge of the Kuzminsky District Court who in 2004 released Andrei Khovanov, former head of the Citi-Energo company, is still under investigation.
But Olga Makarova, the Odyntsovsky District Court judge who left Vera Trifonova, a businesswoman, to die in pretrial prison, was allowed to file a voluntary resignation. Judge Yelena Stashina, who extended Magnitsky's arrest, has not faced any charges.
A Message from The Moscow Times:
Dear readers,
We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."
These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.
We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.
Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.
By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.
Remind me later.