Enjoying ad-free content?
Since July 1, 2024, we have disabled all ads to improve your reading experience.
This commitment costs us $10,000 a month. Your support can help us fill the gap.
Support us
Our journalism is banned in Russia. We need your help to keep providing you with the truth.

Fray Between Putin and Medvedev to Get Uglier

Vladimir Filonov

The continuing uncertainty about whether President Dmitry Medvedev or Prime Minister Vladimir Putin will run for president in 2012 is becoming a source of political instability.

The mounting tensions between the political courts around each leader are threatening to upend the political calm in the nation and plunge Russia into a clannish warfare rivaling the late 1990s.

The political courts are already waging media wars positioning themselves for a showdown in a few months. Medvedev’s court is on the offensive and is trying to box the president into a decision even before he sorts this out with Putin.

In September, Medvedev’s press secretary Natalya Timakova went out on a limb to state in an interview that Medvedev’s modernization agenda extends well beyond a single presidential term, inferring that he should run again, a proposition that Medvedev has not yet endorsed.

Then on Oct. 21, Igor Yurgens, who is head of the Institute for Contemporary Development and claims to be an adviser to Medvedev, crossed the line by stating that Putin should not run for president again in 2012 because “modernization is associated, both domestically and abroad, with Medvedev.”

Yurgens condescendingly sought to disparage Putin as being “popular with conservative voters — the ones who make an emphasis on stability, discipline and order.”

Then Yurgens placed a political kiss of death on Medvedev, saying that he is “popular with liberals bent on progress and changes” and painting Medvedev as an elitist “liberal” — a public image that all but dooms his electoral prospects. Yurgens earlier endorsed NATO membership for Russia. With friends like these, does Medvedev need enemies?

Putin’s court retaliated by planting stories that portrayed Medvedev’s closest advisers as an “American lobby” and casting the president’s attempts at economic and political modernization as “another perestroika,” implying that their consequences could be as disastrous for Russia as perestroika was for the Soviet Union from 1985 to 1991.

Amid all of this comes the manifesto on “enlightened conservatism” by film director Nikita Mikhalkov, who has a very close relationship with Putin. For all its flowery language, the manifesto is no less than an ideological alternative to “liberal modernization” pushed by Medvedev’s court of “Westernizers.”

This battle will only get uglier. Stay tuned.

Vladimir Frolov is president of LEFF Group, a government-relations and PR company.

… we have a small favor to ask. As you may have heard, The Moscow Times, an independent news source for over 30 years, has been unjustly branded as a "foreign agent" by the Russian government. This blatant attempt to silence our voice is a direct assault on the integrity of journalism and the values we hold dear.

We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. Our commitment to providing accurate and unbiased reporting on Russia remains unshaken. But we need your help to continue our critical mission.

Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and you can be confident that you're making a significant impact every month by supporting open, independent journalism. Thank you.

paiment methods
Not ready to support today?
Remind me later.

Read more