Addressing Russian managers and specialists at a week-long seminar on hydrocarbon legislation. Sir James drew on Britain's experience with privatization of its gas industry to call for a similar conversion for Gasprom.
Because of conflicting ownership claims as Russia's state gas industry tries to privatize, Western businesses have struggled to conclude meaningful deals either for export of gas or the development of new fields and pipelines.
McKinnon said that the gas industry was a "natural monopoly" because competing pipelines are impractical. But pricing, he said, was a key issue.
"It is vital to have adequate regulation if you are going to have a monopoly of the gas supply", he said. "Regulators must not interfere in the management of companies. Regulators are referees".
Sir James said that it was of vital importance that Russia manage its reforms successfully the first time around. To that end, a private -- though regulated -- gas industry would be a significant source of income and stability for Russia, he said.
He described Britain's privatization program as a valuable model that Russia might wish to emulate for its successful integration of a giant monopoly industry into the private sector.
"British Gas was privatized as a monopoly, but our regulators have kept the industry fair", he said. "We have learned a great deal about the relationship between competition and regulation".
Peter Cameron, Director of the Dutch-based International Energy Institute which sponsored the seminar, agreed that Russia's gas industry should privatize while remaining a monopoly, subject to strict price regulations.
"But it is important not to overestimate the impact of law", he said. "If Western investors are going to invest enormous sums in Russia, they want a guarantee of stability and a return on their money".
A Message from The Moscow Times:
Dear readers,
We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."
These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.
We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.
Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.
By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.
Remind me later.