The charge surfaced in an article in Literaturnaya Gazeta by poet Alexander Tankov, who quoted a passage from Shishkin's novel -- supposedly a fragment of the memoirs of a Soviet diva -- and a passage from the memoirs of Vera Panova, a once-popular writer. Beyond any reasonable doubt, Shishkin's text was based on Panova's, with only minor changes to names and epithets.
The story was soon noticed by Internet users, especially on the popular blogging site LiveJournal. Among Shishkin's most vocal critics was another man of letters, Alexei Tsvetkov, one of the finest poets of the older generation. Tsvetkov called Shishkin a thief, while also admitting that he had never read his books. Many supported the accusations; others vigorously refuted them, saying that a postmodernist author was free to choose his "building blocks."
In response, Shishkin wrote a letter to a friend with permission to distribute it freely. The friend posted the letter in his blog, and within hours, it was the most-quoted text of the day. The gist of Shishkin's rebuttal boiled down to admitting he had used Panova's memoirs, but claiming that all of his texts were quilts made of other people's material. (Indeed, readers quickly found parts of "Maidenhair" taken almost verbatim from Xenophon's "Anabasis.")
The tone of Shishkin's letter struck many as arrogant -- "I write the literature of the next generation," he stated -- but it also led to much misunderstanding. One phrase in particular deserves closer scrutiny. Shishkin wrote, "They are judging my texts as if they were theirs, which is like trying to judge intergalactic forces by the fall of an apple." If you ask me, there is nothing remotely condescending or insulting in this passage; Shishkin is merely saying that his prose is different, just as Einsteinian physics was different from (not better than) Newtonian physics.
I'm sure Shishkin foresaw the reaction to his letter and peppered it with ambiguous statements on purpose. Which only confirms his reputation as a provocative author who lives by his own laws.
A Message from The Moscow Times:
Dear readers,
We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."
These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.
We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.
Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.
By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.
Remind me later.