×
Enjoying ad-free content?
Since July 1, 2024, we have disabled all ads to improve your reading experience.
This commitment costs us $10,000 a month. Your support can help us fill the gap.
Support us
Our journalism is banned in Russia. We need your help to keep providing you with the truth.

Gazprom Won't Use Kovykta Field, Leaving It in Limbo

Gazprom said it had no plans to tap the Kovykta gas field soon. ?€?We don't see any demand for gas from this field at all in the foreseeable future,?€? a Gazprom projects chief said. S. Nikolayev

Gazprom reiterated on Monday that it had no plans to tap the giant Kovykta field any time soon, leaving the future of the valuable asset, part-owned by BP, on tenterhooks.

BP's 50-50 venture with Russian billionaires, TNK-BP, agreed to sell the field to Gazprom in 2007 in a deal that collapsed later in the midst of a shareholder feud in the joint company.

The government has recently renewed threats that it would strip TNK-BP of the rights to develop Kovykta — ruining its investment of nearly $1 billion — because the company has been unable to produce as much gas as the license requires. Lower output has been a consequence of a nationwide ban on independent gas exports, which made Gazprom a monopoly for foreign trade of the commodity.

“We don't see any demand for gas from this field at all in the foreseeable future, both for sales in that region and export deliveries,” Gazprom's eastern projects chief Viktor Timoshilov said at a news conference.

TNK-BP, which controls Kovykta through a majority stake in license holder Rusia Petroleum, said last week that Rusia Petroleum had filed for bankruptcy because it couldn't repay loans borrowed from TNK-BP to develop the field. A court may well order the sale of Kovykta's license as a way to compensate TNK-BP.

With 2 trillion cubic meters of gas under the ground, Kovykta qualifies as a strategic asset under a 2008 law, meaning that only a state-controlled company such as Gazprom could bid for the field. State asset holding company Rosneftegaz has also been named as a potential bidder.

Should the government take the license away, it could hand it over to Gazprom free of charge. Gazprom had said earlier that it wasn't going to develop Kovykta until 2017, if the company assumes ownership. Kovykta lies close to China to the south, but analysts agree that sales there are a very distant prospect because of disagreements over the price.

Gazprom, which received the license for developing the similarly large Chayandinskoye field in Russia's far north last year, said it wouldn't depend on Kovykta to supply China.

“We don't have the problem of resource base in the region,” Timoshilov said Monday.

Suffering a dip in sales, Gazprom has recently demonstrated much more dedication to its pipeline-building ambitions than it did to investing in new fields.

It announced Monday that its 50-50 joint venture with Greece's Hellenic Gas Transmission System Operator, or DESFA, will soon apply for formal incorporation in Greece to design, fund, construct and operate the stretch of the South Stream line in that country. The pipeline will carry gas from Russia under the Black Sea to southern Europe, circumventing Ukraine.

Also on Monday, Gazprom denied plans to replace its deputy chief in charge of exports, Alexander Medvedev, Bloomberg reported. Gazprom chief Alexei Miller ruled out the possibility in e-mailed comments after Kommersant reported that the company might remove Medvedev in an effort to change its export policy that led it to charge much higher prices in Europe than its competition.

Sign up for our free weekly newsletter

Our weekly newsletter contains a hand-picked selection of news, features, analysiss and more from The Moscow Times. You will receive it in your mailbox every Friday. Never miss the latest news from Russia. Preview
Subscribers agree to the Privacy Policy

A Message from The Moscow Times:

Dear readers,

We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."

These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.

We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.

Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.

By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.

Once
Monthly
Annual
Continue
paiment methods
Not ready to support today?
Remind me later.

Read more