"If the threat was to tail down, then the level of overt army patrolling on the streets could be tailed down," Sir Hugh Annesley, chief constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary, or RUCtold BBC radio.
He ruled out a complete withdrawal of British troops, which now number 18,000, as "naive" but said the armed presence that has turned daily life into a state of siege could be scaled down if the police were "no longer being rocketed and bombed on a daily basis."
Annesley's remarks coincided with renewed speculation that the Irish Republican Army might shortly announce an unprecedented halt to its campaign to end British rule and to reunite the province with the Irish Republic.
Such speculation has increased with the anniversary this Sunday of the deployment of British troops a quarter of a century ago to protect police trying to quell civil unrest and IRA attacks on police and government targets.
Their deployment heralded the start of the Troubles, as Northern Ireland's political and sectarian strife is known, making the province's 1.5 million people hostage to rival groups of guerrillas.
Republican sources said the IRA was actively discussing an extended truce to wring concessions from Britain on an Anglo-Irish peace plan for the province. The IRA's political wing, Sinn Fein, says the plan as it now stands is not radical enough for its members to accept.
Ken Maginnis of the mainstream Protestant group the Ulster Unionist Party said Annesley's remarks were tantamount to negotiation with the IRA and called on him to resign as head of the 12,000-strong armed police force.
"He has given the IRA its biggest boost of the past 12 months by offering to 'tail down,'" Maginnis said, "and the courageous men and women (of the RUC) will feel humiliated."
A Message from The Moscow Times:
Dear readers,
We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."
These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.
We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.
Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.
By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.
Remind me later.