Install

Get the latest updates as we post them — right on your browser

Today's paper. Last Updated: 02/10/2012

A Diversified Economy Is Not for Rent

To Our Readers

The Moscow Times welcomes letters to the editor. Letters for publication should be signed and bear the signatory's address and telephone number.
Letters to the editor should be sent by fax to (7-495) 232-6529, by e-mail to oped@imedia.ru, or by post. The Moscow Times reserves the right to edit letters.

Email the Opinion Page Editor

The need for economic diversification has been a frequent refrain inside and outside the government in recent years.

Pet projects like the Superjet regional airliner or the federally supported nanotechnology program have been trumpeted as ways forward on this front, but they are isolated examples.

While the global economic crisis might increase the uncertainty surrounding these projects, ironically, it may also shift the economy away from the activity that has been one of the greatest obstacles to diversification: rent-taking.

As energy and commodities prices skyrocketed in recent years, the country's economy became one based on the collection of rents, in this case from the control of public institutions and natural resources.

Russia's location on top of an enormous wealth of oil, gas and mineral resources has been the main driver of growth in recent years. As much of the infrastructure for extracting these resources already existed when resource prices spiked, all that was left to do was sit back and collect the money.

The amount of money that poured in, in turn, generated a steep climb in the value of the ruble, further discouraging business development as domestic manufactures became uncompetitive. Value-added exports were simply too expensive and imports too cheap.

But the ruble has been sliding, and the Central Bank's announcement Monday that it was widening the band within which it would allow its value to rise or fall -- as if there were some debate about which way it would move -- means that the slide will likely continue.

The second form of economic rent, through control of public institutions, has arguably had the more stifling effect, in the form of corruption and untrammeled bureaucratic impediments to innovation and the establishment of new businesses.

The cost in bribes and time spent negotiating the country's bureaucratic labyrinth has proven too hefty for many businesspeople.

The biggest beneficiary of this system has been the state, and as long as commodities revenues kept pouring in, there was little impetus, or even opportunity, for the government to change things much.

With those revenues drying up and the ruble weakening, the impetus may finally be there.

Calls for serious measures to combat corruption and bureaucratic barriers have been taken up by President Dmitry Medvedev as part of his public political mantra.

Understandably, there has been skepticism about the level of Medvedev's commitment, but there might now be little choice.

The search for new sources of revenue makes innovation and the development of new businesses even more important in the immediate future. Hopefully, it will also help turn rent collection as the country's dominant economic activity into a thing of the past.

Also in Opinion

Putin Chasing Imaginary American Ghosts

Here we go again — another round of anti-Americanism from the Kremlin and state-controlled media. Blaming outside forces for Russia's woes has a long history in the country. The closer we get to the March 4 presidential election, the more intense the anti-American hysteria becomes.


Putting Everything In Its Place

Remember how I drove you all nuts with the innate propensity of Russian creatures and inanimate objects to stand, sit or lie? And how relieved you were when I moved on to other topics?
Well, I'm back.

Russia Gets Bad Rap Over Syria

As the violent standoff between Syria's security forces and armed opposition groups roils the country, the crisis has opened heated divisions at the United Nations Security Council.

A Propaganda Breakdown

Propaganda is not as powerful as many think. You might convince Russians that people in Egypt, Italy and Ukraine are paid or otherwise persuaded to join street protests, but you certainly cannot convince them that their own dissatisfaction with the government is the result of a foreign conspiracy.

Violent Reaction to Protests Could Bury Putin

Nonviolent revolutions do not always remain nonviolent, as the examples of uprisings in Egypt, Libya and Syria in the Arab Spring have shown. But peaceful movements for regime change often do succeed. For example, they have toppled illegitimate rulers, as with the post-Soviet Color Revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine, and ended apartheid in South Africa.

Realpolitik Without Realism

People have been asking me all week why the Kremlin is so stubbornly supportive of Syrian President Bashar Assad. "Is Russia's support based solely on weapons contracts with Syria," they wonder, "or the Kremlin's desire to maintain its naval base at the Tartus port?"




Discussion
The Moscow Times welcomes your comments and invites you to discuss topics with other readers. Your comment will be posted automatically to enable a live discussion. If you aren't familiar with our comments policy, you can read it here.

If you're a registered user, you can start typing your comment below. If not, take a moment to sign up. and then return to the article.

If your comment doesn't appear, contact us by using our web form.

Comments

Comments via Facebook

print


Comments

This article has no comments.

Be the first to leave a comment



To Our Readers

The Moscow Times welcomes letters to the editor. Letters for publication should be signed and bear the signatory's address and telephone number.

Letters to the editor should be sent by fax to (7-495) 232-6529, by e-mail to oped@imedia.ru, or by post. The Moscow Times reserves the right to edit letters.



Most Read