Install

Get the latest updates as we post them — right on your browser

Today's paper. Last Updated: 06/03/2012

Stonehenge Haunted by Specter of Modern Era

STONEHENGE, England -- Clews Everard has the toughest job in British tourism.


She is the general manager of Stonehenge, the prehistoric circle of stones that lures archaeologists, protesters, Druids, New Age travelers, film crews and 750,000 tourists annually to the green wind-swept Salisbury Plain.


At Stonehenge, people want to celebrate marriages, have their loved one's ashes spread, pray and play music at sunrise. There was even a group of protesters who showed up in May and rappelled off the stones.


"Stonehenge evokes this passion," Everard says. "There isn't anyone who doesn't have a reaction when they see the stones. I suspect because it is all so much a mystery. No one knows why it was built, or why it was actually built here. That is part of its attraction."


And its curse. For the truth is, the British have an uncertain relationship with their most important archaeological site.


It was built and rebuilt between 3100 B.C. and 1600 B.C., according to the latest research. It is the most significant Bronze Age structure in Europe, archaeologists say. But it sits on a sliver of land where modern society and ancient history clash. The conflict could become more pronounced with a plan to build a four-lane highway near the site.


Thomas Hardy, in "Tess of the D'Urbervilles," wrote of it as a place inducing contemplation: "The wind, playing upon the edifice, produced a booming tune, like the note of some gigantic one-stringed harp."


The wind still plays, but the auto has long-since replaced the harp as the predominate sound. A trip to the site is a lot like spending a few moments at the Vince Lombardi Service Area on the New Jersey Turnpike.


"People stop at Stonehenge for the loos [toilets]," says Peter Fowler, professor of archaeology at Newcastle University. "They're the only loos on the road between London and Penzance."


Stonehenge lies between two roads that meet in an intersection shaped like a "V." It's nothing to see tourists charge off a bus, go to the bathroom, buy a sandwich and a postcard and then stand behind a barbed wire fence to take a picture of Stonehenge before being hustled onward to Salisbury Cathedral. Those who want to linger at the site have to cope with the noise of rumbling trucks, speeding cars, and helicopters from a nearby air base.


"This is not just a pile of old stones in Wiltshire County," Everard says. "In world terms, Stonehenge is as important as the Great Wall of China or the Pyramids in Egypt."


But Stonehenge, unlike the other monuments, has never gotten a lot of respect in its own country. Victorian-era tourists chipped off bits of stone with hammers rented from local blacksmiths. A military leader during World War I considered razing the site in favor of expanding an airfield. The government did not take control of the place until 1918.


In the 1960s, hippies came in search of the meaning of life -- and a cheap place to camp. Now, the site is a magnet for protesters ranging from environmentalists to civil libertarians.


At first glance, Stonehenge can be a disappointment, the tallest stone -- 6.4 meters high -- is dwarfed by the expanse of sky and rolling land. But walk through the tunnel that links parking lot to sacred ground, and come to the edge of the chain fence that encircles Stonehenge, and the view is better, the stones more imposing, the main structure looming as a thing of beauty.


Stonehenge takes time to comprehend. The Sarsen Circle, 30.5 meters in diameter, is what gives Stonehenge its majestic sweep, the boulders reaching to the sky and capped by lintels, the great blocks of stone laid end to end. Bluestones from the Preseli Mountains 390 kilometers to the west in Wales are arrayed in a ruined inner circle. Two horseshoes of uprights form the site's core and lead to a now partially buried altar stone.


From inside-out, Stonehenge reveals its grandeur, the stones framing the view of the sky and the land beyond. It hangs over you. It dominates you.


Stonehenge's mysterious origins continue to excite and confound archaeologists. Stonehenge was constructed and reconstructed over a span of 15 centuries; there is even a legend that Merlin brought the stones from Ireland.


But just why it was built, or what significance it had, are all open for debate.


"Despite all the efforts to understand it, science has failed to come up with a firm answer as to what it is," Fowler says. "Most believe that it is in some form or another a multiperiod temple, which at the very least, involved observation of the sun and probably the moon."


Others have drawn their own interpretations of Stonehenge. In the 1960s, it became quite fashionable to view it as a celestial observatory and calculator. Others have claimed the Druids, an Iron Age priesthood, used the site to carry out sacrifices.


Modern-day Druids still troop out to the site for services. Most shun publicity. But a few, like a man who calls himself "King Arthur," try to seize the inner circle during the summer solstice. Of course, the king appears when the cameras come out.


Next month, a planning conference takes up the contentious issue of building a new road through the area -- the A303 trunk road linking Amesbury and Berwick Down. In a country where anti-road zealots have been known to throw themselves in front of bulldozers or stay in trees for weeks, the Stonehenge conference should be, at the very least, theatrical.


English Heritage and the National Trust, which oversee the surrounding 610 hectares, are jointly pushing an expensive plan to bury a kilometer segment of the new road in a tunnel. Under this plan, a new visitor center and parking lot would be built more than a kilometer from where they are today. Stonehenge would be returned to a more pastoral setting.


"Stonehenge, instead of being a national disgrace, can be made into the eighth wonder of the world," Jocelyn Stevens, chairman of English Heritage, said last month in a speech pushing the tunnel proposal.


The transportation department has put forward a number of other plans, all cheaper but apparently none to the liking of the "Save Stonehenge" crowd.


But the department is literally caught between a pile of rocks and the army. To the north lies land owned by the Ministry of Defense. To the south is the rolling land that swallows Stonehenge.


"Even a short tunnel won't solve the problem," Fowler says. "If they try to build that, there will be riots. This is a sacred landscape."


Stonehenge has survived the Romans and the tourists, the Victorians and the hippies. Somehow, it will even survive the road builders.




This article has no comments.

Be the first to leave a comment


Discussion
The Moscow Times welcomes your comments and invites you to discuss topics with other readers. Your comment will be posted automatically to enable a live discussion. If you aren't familiar with our comments policy, you can read it here.

If you're a registered user, you can start typing your comment below. If not, take a moment to sign up. and then return to the article.

If your comment doesn't appear, contact us by using our web form.

Comments

Comments via Facebook



print


Comments

This article has no comments.

Be the first to leave a comment





Most Read