Install

Get the latest updates as we post them — right on your browser

Today's paper. Last Updated: 05/28/2012

The Kremlin's China Problem

China’s success has been very important for Russia. Of course, Russian leaders find it hard to admit that they envy the Chinese. After all, when Communists took power in Beijing in 1949, China was a younger Communist brother, learning Marxism-Leninism at the feet of their more experienced Soviet comrades. Then, after Josef Stalin died in 1953, there were three decades of tension and hostility. They even fought a seven-month battle along their long shared border during the height of the Chinese-Soviet split in 1969.

But to Russian nationalists, Communists and others nostalgic for the Soviet era, China provided a highly successful alternative to Western democracy espoused by Mikhail Gorbachev and Boris Yeltsin. In those circles, democracy and market capitalism in Russia are seen as a failure, resulting in corrupt privatization, winner-takes-all crony capitalism and the humiliating capitulation in the Cold War. Many in Russia believe that China made the right decision to leave the monopolist Communist Party apparatus in charge and curb political freedoms while implementing market reforms.

In the Kremlin, China is seen as a natural ally against the United States. Moscow eagerly chimes in with Beijing in criticizing the U.S.-dominated “unipolar” world, its huge debt and weakening dollar. Russia would like to join forces with China to find an alternative to the dollar as a reserve currency, but the Chinese are understandably reluctant to undermine the greenback since the bulk of China’s $3.2 trillion worth of hard currency reserves is held in dollars.

The Kremlin also sees China as an alternative to the European market for oil and natural gas. Russia hopes that its oil pipeline from Eastern Siberia to the Pacific Ocean and China will not only boost its export revenues but give the Kremlin more leverage as it tries to exert political pressure on the West by turning its energy spigot on and off when necessary.

But all this may come crashing down. China is teetering on the brink of an economic crisis. Economists worry that the Chinese economy may be facing a hard landing. The Chinese real estate market, which is every bit as inflated as the U.S. bubble that burst in 2008, is starting to come off the boil. Prices are stagnant or declining in more than half of urban markets.

While China may not have a subprime mortgage problem that hit the U.S. banking system, Chinese banks sharply increased lending after 2008 on the instructions from the government to counteract the global economic slowdown. The amount of loans issued by Chinese banks, at nearly $8 trillion, dwarfs both Greece’s $350 billion of debt and even Italy’s $2.5 trillion. With the jobless rate rising, the debt burden may undermine China’s notoriously opaque banking system.

True, nobody has made any money doubting China’s resilience over the past three decades. But a crisis has to come sooner or later, especially since the Chinese economy is so dangerously unbalanced.

The Communists in Beijing have been living in mortal fear of an economic crisis, afraid that it would trigger political unrest. They never let the economy release any steam in a smaller downturn, which means that when a crisis does eventually occur, it is bound to be a major one. How the rigid, one-party political system will fare is anyone’s guess.

In any case, China is likely to be preoccupied with its economic problems in coming years. As a result, Beijing may be drawn much closer to Washington, leaving Moscow on its own to combat the U.S.-dominated “unipolar” world.

Alexei Bayer, a native Muscovite, is a New York-based economist.





This article has no comments.

Be the first to leave a comment


Discussion
The Moscow Times welcomes your comments and invites you to discuss topics with other readers. Your comment will be posted automatically to enable a live discussion. If you aren't familiar with our comments policy, you can read it here.

If you're a registered user, you can start typing your comment below. If not, take a moment to sign up. and then return to the article.

If your comment doesn't appear, contact us by using our web form.

Comments

Comments via Facebook



Also in Opinion

There's Just One Nationality — Mathematician

Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind."

Russia's New Propaganda Minister

After Monday's announcement that historian Vladimir Medinsky was appointed the culture minister, critics quickly labeled him the new propaganda minister. Medinsky's academic ethics and historical distortions may raise serious questions, but for the Kremlin, he has three important attributes that are much more important: He is a model United Russia leader, a firm Putin loyalist and a skilled sophist.

Spinning Medvedev's Government

Were this 2008 and not 2012 — and had Dmitry Medvedev been named prime minister without having first served a full term as president — then the composition of his new government might have created a generally positive impression.

New Government Faces Old Problems

A longstanding platitude shared by both the Kremlin as well as domestic and foreign analysts is the need for Russia to diversify its economy away from energy dependence and reduce its non-oil budget deficit.

Putin's Postman Delivers Nothing at the G8

In the mid-1990s, former President Boris Yeltsin fought hard for the right to sit as equal at the same table with the leaders of the world's seven leading democracies. Using a lot of political wrangling, Moscow finally secured permanent membership in this elite club where the real heavyweights are supposed to solve the world's most pressing problems.

Russia Stays Home

Just three days before his return to the Kremlin as president, Vladimir Putin met behind closed doors at his residence in Novo-Ogaryovo, outside Moscow, with U.S. National Security Adviser Tom Donilon, who was there to transmit President Barack Obama's renewed determination to strengthen cooperation with Russia.



print


Comments

This article has no comments.

Be the first to leave a comment



To Our Readers

The Moscow Times welcomes letters to the editor. Letters for publication should be signed and bear the signatory's address and telephone number.

Letters to the editor should be sent by fax to (7-495) 232-6529, by e-mail to oped@imedia.ru, or by post. The Moscow Times reserves the right to edit letters.



Most Read
MarketGid