Install

Get the latest updates as we post them — right on your browser

Today's paper. Last Updated: 02/10/2012

Exhibit A of a Terrible Propaganda Campaign

When I got back home to my apartment in Tbilisi on Saturday night, the babysitter was standing by the window, looking out over the riverside highway, scanning the road for Russian tanks and the skyline for incoming fighter jets. By that time, she had already learned that a television report about a new Russian invasion broadcast earlier that evening wasn’t real but a simulation intended to warn that the Kremlin was capable of launching an offensive to seize Georgia. Even though she knew fully well that it was a  mock report, she couldn’t manage to dispel her frantic visions of Russian soldiers advancing toward the city.

I first heard about the controversial program while it was on air. A friend took a call on her cell phone, then burst out in an outraged yelp, “The Russians are attacking!” Enemy troops had already reached Mtskheta, a town just a few kilometers outside the capital, she babbled nervously. When she called back to find out more, she was quickly reassured that the broadcast was a hoax.

 But others, it seems, were completely taken in by it.

There were reports that some people in villages close to South Ossetia, where the worst clashes took place during the war with Russia in August 2008, started preparing to evacuate women and children. Several people reportedly suffered heart attacks, and I also heard rumors about groups of young men getting weapons together and making ready to mount a guerrilla-style defense of Tbilisi when the Russian soldiers entered the city.

The reaction the next day, after the truth had sunk in, was fury. Many people felt that they had been emotionally exploited by the fake report, which revived painful memories and vividly demonstrated that there are still genuine fears of renewed conflict with Russia here.

Some are also convinced that because the television station that aired the report is run by an ally of President Mikheil Saakashvili, it must have been sanctioned by the Georgian leadership. Saakashvili has strongly denied this, even saying his own grandmother was distressed by the broadcast.

But his detractors continue to believe that it was a bungled, poorly thought-out attempt at political propaganda, intended to scare people into rallying around their government, which backfired in spectacular fashion.

Matthew Collin is a journalist based in Tbilisi.




Tags

Georgia South Ossetia media



Also in Opinion

Putin Chasing Imaginary American Ghosts

Here we go again — another round of anti-Americanism from the Kremlin and state-controlled media. Blaming outside forces for Russia's woes has a long history in the country. The closer we get to the March 4 presidential election, the more intense the anti-American hysteria becomes.


Putting Everything In Its Place

Remember how I drove you all nuts with the innate propensity of Russian creatures and inanimate objects to stand, sit or lie? And how relieved you were when I moved on to other topics?
Well, I'm back.

Russia Gets Bad Rap Over Syria

As the violent standoff between Syria's security forces and armed opposition groups roils the country, the crisis has opened heated divisions at the United Nations Security Council.

A Propaganda Breakdown

Propaganda is not as powerful as many think. You might convince Russians that people in Egypt, Italy and Ukraine are paid or otherwise persuaded to join street protests, but you certainly cannot convince them that their own dissatisfaction with the government is the result of a foreign conspiracy.

Violent Reaction to Protests Could Bury Putin

Nonviolent revolutions do not always remain nonviolent, as the examples of uprisings in Egypt, Libya and Syria in the Arab Spring have shown. But peaceful movements for regime change often do succeed. For example, they have toppled illegitimate rulers, as with the post-Soviet Color Revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine, and ended apartheid in South Africa.

Realpolitik Without Realism

People have been asking me all week why the Kremlin is so stubbornly supportive of Syrian President Bashar Assad. "Is Russia's support based solely on weapons contracts with Syria," they wonder, "or the Kremlin's desire to maintain its naval base at the Tartus port?"




Discussion
The Moscow Times welcomes your comments and invites you to discuss topics with other readers. Your comment will be posted automatically to enable a live discussion. If you aren't familiar with our comments policy, you can read it here.

If you're a registered user, you can start typing your comment below. If not, take a moment to sign up. and then return to the article.

If your comment doesn't appear, contact us by using our web form.

Comments

Comments via Facebook

print


Comments

This article has no comments.

Be the first to leave a comment



To Our Readers

The Moscow Times welcomes letters to the editor. Letters for publication should be signed and bear the signatory's address and telephone number.

Letters to the editor should be sent by fax to (7-495) 232-6529, by e-mail to oped@imedia.ru, or by post. The Moscow Times reserves the right to edit letters.



Most Read