Install

Get the latest updates as we post them — right on your browser

Today's paper. Last Updated: 02/09/2012

Between Tehran and Riyadh

Moscow and Riyadh have reportedly been negotiating for several years now about the Saudi purchase of Russian air-defense missile systems, but so far this has not yet occurred. Several analysts, including myself, have argued that Riyadh has made clear to Moscow that it will not proceed with any large-scale arms purchase from Russia unless Moscow scales back its arms sales to Iran.

But Russia’s relationship with Iran may not the most important factor in Saudi-Russian arms negotiations, and the delay in reaching a deal on air-defense missile systems in particular may  be because of other reasons.

Moscow’s delay — purportedly for “technical reasons”— in delivering S-300 air-defense missile systems to Iran has been attributed to pressure from Saudi Arabia, the United States and Israel. The deterioration in Russian-Iranian relations over the past few months, however, may now be a more important cause for the delay.

Unlike the West, the Kremlin immediately congratulated Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad after he was re-elected in June in a vote that was tainted by allegations of fraud and falsifications. Ahmadinejad, however, found a strange way to return the favor to Moscow: He rejected the International Atomic Energy Agency proposal for Russia and France to enrich Iranian uranium to medical grade. Thus, he increased the international community’s concern that Tehran is trying to develop a nuclear weapons program.

Furthermore, in December and January, Ahmadinejad called for Moscow to provide compensation to Tehran for the Soviet occupation of northern Iran during World War II. Moscow, of course, as a matter of principle does not apologize or provide compensation for any action it took that contributed to the defeat of Adolf Hitler.

In addition, on March 8 Tehran gave all Russian commercial pilots working in Iran two month’s notice to leave the country. Tehran, for its part, is angry that Russian officials are openly saying how increased United Nations Security Council sanctions against Iran may be needed if it does not increase cooperation with the international community on the nuclear issue.

Whatever the cause of Moscow’s previous delay in delivering S-300s to Iran, Tehran’s recent actions have only increased the likelihood of further, perhaps indefinite, delays. Russian’s frustration with Iran has grown so strong that Moscow hardly needs to be persuaded by Riyadh or anyone else to withhold delivery of the S-300s to such a difficult customer.

But if differences over Iran are not delaying the Saudi purchase of air-defense missile systems from Russia, then what is? One theory is that Riyadh does not want to buy the S-300 but the newer and more powerful S-400 instead. Indeed, the Saudis always want to buy the newest weapons systems and can obviously afford to do so. But while the Russian defense industry would be happy to sell the S-400 as well as other modern weapons systems to Saudi Arabia, Russia’s air-defense force wants to acquire all S-400s produced in the next few years for its own long-neglected needs.

Some Russian sources also see pressure from Washington as a reason why Riyadh has not yet signed a major arms agreement with Moscow. But this is unlikely. If anything, the ongoing tensions in U.S.-Saudi relations — as well as the Saudi desire to be seen as independent from Washington —would push Riyadh more in the direction of buying weapons from Russia. In addition, U.S.-Saudi tension is only likely to increase if the drawdown of U.S. forces in Iraq results in Saudi support for Iraqi Sunnis in response to the anticipated increase in Iranian support for various Iraqi Shiite factions.

Thus, it seems that a major Saudi weapons purchase from Russia is highly likely. It is just the timing that is in doubt. If this is the case, then this suggests that Saudi Arabia is far less concerned about whether Iran acquires S-300s to defend itself against Israel or the United States so long as Riyadh can acquire S-400s to protect itself from Tehran.

Mark N. Katz, professor of government and politics at George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia, specializes in Russian foreign policy in the Persian Gulf.




Tags

Saudi Arabia Iran weapons arms



Also in Opinion

Russia Gets Bad Rap Over Syria

As the violent standoff between Syria's security forces and armed opposition groups roils the country, the crisis has opened heated divisions at the United Nations Security Council.

Putin Chasing Imaginary American Ghosts

Here we go again — another round of anti-Americanism from the Kremlin and state-controlled media. We have heard claims that the United States is trying to orchestrate an Orange Revolution in Russia many times before, but it was never this intense.

A Propaganda Breakdown

Propaganda is not as powerful as many think. You might convince Russians that people in Egypt, Italy and Ukraine are paid or otherwise persuaded to join street protests, but you certainly cannot convince them that their own dissatisfaction with the government is the result of a foreign conspiracy.

Putting Everything In Its Place

Remember how I drove you all nuts with the innate propensity of Russian creatures and inanimate objects to stand, sit or lie? And how relieved you were when I moved on to other topics?
Well, I'm back.

Violent Reaction to Protests Could Bury Putin

Nonviolent revolutions do not always remain nonviolent, as the examples of uprisings in Egypt, Libya and Syria in the Arab Spring have shown. But peaceful movements for regime change often do succeed. For example, they have toppled illegitimate rulers, as with the post-Soviet Color Revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine, and ended apartheid in South Africa.

Realpolitik Without Realism

People have been asking me all week why the Kremlin is so stubbornly supportive of Syrian President Bashar Assad. "Is Russia's support based solely on weapons contracts with Syria," they wonder, "or the Kremlin's desire to maintain its naval base at the Tartus port?"




Discussion
The Moscow Times welcomes your comments and invites you to discuss topics with other readers. Your comment will be posted automatically to enable a live discussion. If you aren't familiar with our comments policy, you can read it here.

If you're a registered user, you can start typing your comment below. If not, take a moment to sign up. and then return to the article.

If your comment doesn't appear, contact us by using our web form.

Comments

Comments via Facebook

print


Comments

This article has no comments.

Be the first to leave a comment



To Our Readers

The Moscow Times welcomes letters to the editor. Letters for publication should be signed and bear the signatory's address and telephone number.

Letters to the editor should be sent by fax to (7-495) 232-6529, by e-mail to oped@imedia.ru, or by post. The Moscow Times reserves the right to edit letters.



Most Read