Install

Get the latest updates as we post them — right on your browser

Today's paper. Last Updated: 05/28/2012

America Lost the War on Terror

We are approaching an unhappy anniversary. Ten years ago, New York lived through the horror of the destruction of the World Trade Center. We were all affected by the tragedy. In our small suburban community just north of the city, several families lost their loved ones. A sad occasion under any circumstances, this year’s anniversary will be all the more disheartening because of the current state of the United States. The death of nearly 3,000 Americans was not only senseless, but in some perverse way it contributed to the country’s downfall.

Remember the first reaction to 9/11? The unanimous support for the United States, the flowers at its embassies around the world and the headline in Le Monde “We’re all Americans,” which summed up the public sentiment. Then-President Vladimir Putin was the first foreign leader to express sympathy to George W. Bush, but only because the phone lines were jammed by foreign leaders rushing to do the same. It is all distant a memory now.

The outpouring of solidarity was not due solely to the vivid horror of the attack and the loss of life. It reflected the United States’ standing in the world. It was not only the global economic, military and political leader but a moral one as well. Its Declaration of Independence and Constitution proclaimed the values of freedom and human dignity, which have since become ideals that other civilized countries accept — or at least to which their leaders pay lip service. In a very tangible way, an attack by al-Qaida on New York and Washington was an attack on those ideals and therefore on the entire world.

But over the past decade, U.S. leadership has been tarnished, and the reason for this was a misguided response by Washington to those terrorist attacks. Its “global war on terror” subverted international laws and treaties that the United States had itself proposed and defended, and violated the human rights and freedoms of countless people around the world. U.S. moral authority was the first casualty of the war on terror. 

Then came two pointless and cruel wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. The way they were financed bankrupted the U.S. Treasury, put the United States in debt to foreign creditors and undermined its economic power. Its military prowess and spending, which nearly exceeds the defense budgets of the rest of the world combined, has proved largely ineffectual against a poorly armed, disorganized foe. It still has the strongest military force in history, but fear among U.S. enemies has been tempered by the knowledge that the Pentagon is handcuffed by its existing commitments.

Finally, Americans were told by Bush in the aftermath of 9/11 to worry about nothing and to go shopping. The government created conditions for ordinary Americans to borrow easily and to spend freely, ostensibly without worrying about the future. A massive speculative bubble was created. When it popped, it impoverished the middle class. Moreover, Americans effectively abdicated their constitutional responsibility to control their government.

The initial attacks united the nation. Americans remain largely united, but in only one aspect: A Reuters poll in August found that 73 percent of respondents believe that the country is on the wrong track. The United States is now polarized, with Democrats and Republicans unable to find common ground even in the face of an economic calamity. 

This is proof that the United States was defeated in the war on terror that it had started. As they say, victory has many fathers, but defeat is an orphan.

Alexei Bayer, a native Muscovite, is a New York-based economist.





This article has 3 comments on TheMoscowTimes.com and 3 comments on Facebook.

Leave a comment


Discussion
The Moscow Times welcomes your comments and invites you to discuss topics with other readers. Your comment will be posted automatically to enable a live discussion. If you aren't familiar with our comments policy, you can read it here.

If you're a registered user, you can start typing your comment below. If not, take a moment to sign up. and then return to the article.

If your comment doesn't appear, contact us by using our web form.

Comments



Richard Lambertsen, Ph.D., V.M.D.

TO: Alexei Bayer Is it rational for you to hold that a war on terror could be won? Kindest regards, R. H. Lambertsen, Ph.D., V.M.D

Giles Cattermole

Say what you want about Osama bin Laden [but bear in mind that, for billions of people, he is a hero]. But one man, seventeen soldiers and seventeen box-cutters have changed the world. Many would say, for the better . . . . . A hundred years from now historians will note 9/11, the television images of George Bush reading childrens' stories in Texas, and his ''War on Terror'', as marking the definitive end of the American Century.

George Person

Terrorism is death by a trillion paper cuts, as the US treasury prints out a fresh batch of money to keep the skies of the freeworld sunny, as stepping on an IED really isn't very funny, paying for Mr . Bin Laden's bullet ridden body.

Report Inappropriate Comment




Comments via Facebook



Also in Opinion

There's Just One Nationality — Mathematician

Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind."

Russia's New Propaganda Minister

After Monday's announcement that historian Vladimir Medinsky was appointed the culture minister, critics quickly labeled him the new propaganda minister. Medinsky's academic ethics and historical distortions may raise serious questions, but for the Kremlin, he has three important attributes that are much more important: He is a model United Russia leader, a firm Putin loyalist and a skilled sophist.

Spinning Medvedev's Government

Were this 2008 and not 2012 — and had Dmitry Medvedev been named prime minister without having first served a full term as president — then the composition of his new government might have created a generally positive impression.

New Government Faces Old Problems

A longstanding platitude shared by both the Kremlin as well as domestic and foreign analysts is the need for Russia to diversify its economy away from energy dependence and reduce its non-oil budget deficit.

Putin's Postman Delivers Nothing at the G8

In the mid-1990s, former President Boris Yeltsin fought hard for the right to sit as equal at the same table with the leaders of the world's seven leading democracies. Using a lot of political wrangling, Moscow finally secured permanent membership in this elite club where the real heavyweights are supposed to solve the world's most pressing problems.

Russia Stays Home

Just three days before his return to the Kremlin as president, Vladimir Putin met behind closed doors at his residence in Novo-Ogaryovo, outside Moscow, with U.S. National Security Adviser Tom Donilon, who was there to transmit President Barack Obama's renewed determination to strengthen cooperation with Russia.



print


Comments

This article has 3 comments on TheMoscowTimes.com and 3 comments on Facebook.

Leave a comment


To Our Readers

The Moscow Times welcomes letters to the editor. Letters for publication should be signed and bear the signatory's address and telephone number.

Letters to the editor should be sent by fax to (7-495) 232-6529, by e-mail to oped@imedia.ru, or by post. The Moscow Times reserves the right to edit letters.



Most Read
MarketGid