Install

Get the latest updates as we post them — right on your browser

. Last Updated: 05/17/2013

U.S. Learns From Russia's Lunatic Science

From the Age of Enlightenment onward, ratio — or reason — has been seen as the greatest of human qualities, and science has enjoyed unquestioned authority.

But with the establishment of the Communist regime, Russia unexpectedly veered in the opposite direction. Ironically, it did so even as the Soviets embraced Marxism,  a brainchild of the Enlightenment, with its atheism, faith in progress and claim to being the only "scientific" method to analyze history and forecast the future. Having declared that it would reorder society along scientific, efficient lines, the Soviets promptly invented a class-based, intuitive science and rejected conventional scientific methods.

It's hard to believe, but the three most successful branches of science of the 20th century that form the foundations of the modern world — nuclear physics, computer science and genetics — were declared bourgeois pseudo-sciences during Josef Stalin's era. The world's leading geneticist, Nikolai Vavilov, received the death sentence, which was later commuted to 20 years in the gulag, where he died in 1943. Meanwhile, the work of ignoramuses and lunatics was hailed as true biology.

You would think that it was an aberration, but Russia actually charted the path for the rest of the world. In the U.S., for instance, a large portion of the population believes that global warming and climate change are a hoax invented by climate scientists, despite strong scientific evidence to the contrary, some of which is found in their own backyards.

U.S. Senator Marco Rubio, a likely contender for the Republican presidential nomination in 2016, caused a storm recently when he defended the notion that the Earth is no older than its biblical age of 6,000 years. This episode highlights the fact that Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, an integral part of modern biology, is still a controversial subject in the U.S. Ahead of the Nov. 6 presidential election, a large number of top Republicans ignored scientific opinion polls.

Russia is an ailing country. Its rulers no longer exterminate the people, as they did under Stalin, but since around 1980 it has faced a new problem: an unprecedented population decline. Researchers are puzzled as to why so many Russians have so few children, die so young, kill themselves and each other and emigrate.

The irrational decisions of the past, such as the wholesale destruction of Russian villages, continue to reverberate through Russian society and provide at least a partial explanation for the demographic crisis. In addition, irrationality has survived into the post-Soviet era, manifesting itself in self-destructive behavior such as excessive drinking, smoking, reckless and drunk driving and a reluctance to see a doctor. This behavior even extends to the highly educated middle class.

The rejection of reason and rigorous professional standards are particularly salient in Russian politics and government. Lawmakers don't legislate, ministers are shuffled from one post to another and promoted without regard for their professional competence, and a large percentage of the police, investigators and other members of law enforcement are themselves criminals and embezzlers. Incompetence extends to the highest levels of government, with disastrous results for the country and its people.

Americans once were best-known for their practicality and common sense. Lately, they have caught the Russian disease, rejecting the rational and the scientific in favor of a lunatic, faith-based pseudo-science. Over the long run, the U.S. can expect the same Russian consequences. Last year's Republican presidential primaries were a clear illustration of the irrationality the country is embracing.

Alexei Bayer, a native Muscovite, is a New York-based economist.



comments powered by Disqus



Also in Opinion

Why Putin Wants U.S. Bases in Afghanistan

Only when Putin senses a direct security threat from the Taliban is he able to refrain from his trademark anti-U.S. rhetoric.

After Surkov

The hard-liners who replaced Surkov have focused on supporting conservative family values and the Russian Orthodox Church, while at the same time stoking anti-Western and anti-U.S. sentiments.

Alone Against the Taliban

The Kremlin shouldn't blame the U.S. for its own failure to prepare for the post-2014 period, when Russia will have to defend its southern borders against Islamic extremism on its own.

What Lies Ahead for Russia in the Next Decade

After Putin's re-election, Russia faces two more key junctures. The Kremlin will have to deal with limited revenues and an election cycle.

Why Stalin Would Be Proud of Putin

Putin can count on staying in power as long as he wants, just like Soviet leaders Leonid Brezhnev or Josef Stalin before him.

How Survival Mode Destroyed the Tsarnaevs

The Tsarnaev family, like many in the former Soviet Union, probably has been stuck in survival mode for generations.



print


To Our Readers

The Moscow Times welcomes letters to the editor. Letters for publication should be signed and bear the signatory's address and telephone number.

Letters to the editor should be sent by fax to (7-495) 232-6529, by e-mail to oped@imedia.ru, or by post. The Moscow Times reserves the right to edit letters.



Mмost Read
advertising
Moscow Directory
DELIKATNY PEREEZD

Local & intercity moves...

LA BOTTEGA

Over 170 wines on the wine list, mainly from Italy, France and Spain...