Install

Get the latest updates as we post them — right on your browser

Today's paper. Last Updated: 02/10/2012

The Silent Minority Can Democratize Russia

Russia saw more protests in the first three months of 2010 than it has seen over the past few years. A wave of demonstrations swept from one end of the country to the other. From Kaliningrad to Vladivostok, demonstrators for the first time made both economic and political demands, shouting “Down with the tariff increase!” and “Putin must go!”

The gap between the people and the government is widening further and further. The Kremlin not backing down at all from its power vertical model. If anything, it will only be strengthened. Nonetheless, a growing demand for change can still be heard from the liberal members of society.

In December, the sociological research company Bashkirova & Partners conducted a national survey titled “Democracy in Russia” with a representative sample of 2,000 people and a margin of error of two percentage points. The results painted a clear picture of Russia’s political orientation. The survey revealed that 9 percent of those polled have liberal political values, 18 percent are committed to Communist ideals and 31 percent are loyal supporters of Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and United Russia. The remaining 42 percent of those questioned hold no firm political beliefs, are apolitical or are wavering in their convictions. Under the right circumstances, this large electoral reserve could shift the country’s political balance radically.

As before, people expressed their greatest confidence in traditional institutions: the president (82 percent), the prime minister (82 percent), the Russian Orthodox Church (69 percent) and the armed forces (62 percent). Individually, Putin received an 83 percent confidence rating and President Dmitry Medvedev received 80 percent. With 47 percent of respondents expressing their willingness to vote for United Russia, the party retains its monolithic status and enjoys more support than all other registered political parties combined.

By default, the Kremlin benefits greatly from the Russians’ passivity. Eighty-four percent of the population does not participate in the activities of a single civic organization such as a political party, association or nongovernmental organization, and 81 percent of respondents have not taken part in a single form of communication with the authorities or in efforts to protect their own interests. Only 5 percent of all Russians have joined protests and even fewer have addressed letters or appeals to the authorities. Despite what would appear to be an increase in protests during the first quarter of the year, most people remain unwilling to take part in protests. At the peak of the economic crisis in late 2009, only 23 percent of respondents were willing to attend a rally, and only 12 percent were ready to take part in a strike. This demonstrates how authorities and the people live in two completely different universes that rarely intersect each other.

Putin’s power vertical is built on a foundation made of sand. All that it takes for the structure to completely collapse is a few more convulsions — that is, a few more protests that are expected in the coming months.

Despite sky-high ratings for the ruling tandem, the people gave only a “C” grade for the effectiveness of the country’s political system, and 60 percent of those questioned expressed dissatisfaction with the development of democracy in Russia.

Russians hold deep reservations concerning the legitimacy of the current authorities. Only 38 percent of respondents believe that Russia’s leaders — including those at the top — are voted into office through free and fair elections, and fewer than half believe that the modern Russian state is democratic.

The survey results do not support the Kremlin’s course toward re-Sovietizing Russia, including the renewed heroization of Josef Stalin, television programs portraying Chekists as heroes and the manipulation and falsification of Russian and Soviet history. Only one-third of the Russian public holds a favorable opinion of “Father Stalin,” and it gives the same low rating on the Soviet regime that it gives to Putin’s regime.

Most Russians have a largely archaic and socialistic understanding of democracy. They see it not as a system of political competition, but as ensuring universal suffrage, election of the head of state, a social safety net and equality. At the same time, the people do have a long and clearly defined list of complaints to their leaders. At the top of the list are inflation, unemployment, a decline in manufacturing, low incomes and the high price of housing.

The liberal and democratic-leaning segment of society is even unhappier than the general population with the current situation and political course the country has taken. Not only does this segment constitute nearly 10 percent of the population, but it is also comprised of the most educated and progressive members of society — the very people who will serve as the incubator and locomotive for modernizing the country.

The main complaints liberals have against the authorities and their policies include the high social stratification of society, runaway corruption, the need to pay for services that are officially free and the special and privileged position that government officials occupy in society. They are also unhappy about the dominance of monopolies, the lack of free and fair elections, censorship of the media, the de facto one-party system and the abuses committed by Federal Security Service agents and the police. More than 70 percent of the liberal segment of the population holds a strong aversion to these key features of Putin’s “sovereign democracy.”

Today, the liberal members of society do not have a single deputy in parliament who can represent their interests and values. Liberal voters vote in large numbers in elections, but the authorities use various tricks and manipulations to make sure that liberal candidates are disqualified from running for office based on trumped-up technical violations, or in the few cases where they do run every administrative resource is used to make sure that they don’t cross the minimum threshold to win the election.

Under Putin’s vertical power structure, liberal-minded Russians have been suppressed and excluded from the political process, but this does not mean that they will remain silent. They will fight to have their voices heard and represented. They will continue to protest against government abuse and manipulation. Although liberals are still the minority in Russia, they are a very influential and talented segment of the population. They must be allowed to play their role in modernizing Russia and to help the country become more democratic, free and prosperous.

Vladimir Ryzhkov, a State Duma deputy from 1993 to 2007, hosts a political talk show on Ekho Moskvy radio.




Tags

politics democracy



Also in Opinion

Putin Chasing Imaginary American Ghosts

Here we go again — another round of anti-Americanism from the Kremlin and state-controlled media. Blaming outside forces for Russia's woes has a long history in the country. The closer we get to the March 4 presidential election, the more intense the anti-American hysteria becomes.


Putting Everything In Its Place

Remember how I drove you all nuts with the innate propensity of Russian creatures and inanimate objects to stand, sit or lie? And how relieved you were when I moved on to other topics?
Well, I'm back.

Russia Gets Bad Rap Over Syria

As the violent standoff between Syria's security forces and armed opposition groups roils the country, the crisis has opened heated divisions at the United Nations Security Council.

A Propaganda Breakdown

Propaganda is not as powerful as many think. You might convince Russians that people in Egypt, Italy and Ukraine are paid or otherwise persuaded to join street protests, but you certainly cannot convince them that their own dissatisfaction with the government is the result of a foreign conspiracy.

Violent Reaction to Protests Could Bury Putin

Nonviolent revolutions do not always remain nonviolent, as the examples of uprisings in Egypt, Libya and Syria in the Arab Spring have shown. But peaceful movements for regime change often do succeed. For example, they have toppled illegitimate rulers, as with the post-Soviet Color Revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine, and ended apartheid in South Africa.

Realpolitik Without Realism

People have been asking me all week why the Kremlin is so stubbornly supportive of Syrian President Bashar Assad. "Is Russia's support based solely on weapons contracts with Syria," they wonder, "or the Kremlin's desire to maintain its naval base at the Tartus port?"




Discussion
The Moscow Times welcomes your comments and invites you to discuss topics with other readers. Your comment will be posted automatically to enable a live discussion. If you aren't familiar with our comments policy, you can read it here.

If you're a registered user, you can start typing your comment below. If not, take a moment to sign up. and then return to the article.

If your comment doesn't appear, contact us by using our web form.

Comments

Comments via Facebook

print


Comments

This article has no comments.

Be the first to leave a comment



To Our Readers

The Moscow Times welcomes letters to the editor. Letters for publication should be signed and bear the signatory's address and telephone number.

Letters to the editor should be sent by fax to (7-495) 232-6529, by e-mail to oped@imedia.ru, or by post. The Moscow Times reserves the right to edit letters.



Most Read