Install

Get the latest updates as we post them — right on your browser

Today's paper. Last Updated: 02/10/2012

Betting on a Philosopher’s High-Tech Stone

Why have first deputy chief of staff Vladislav Surkov’s plans to build a Russian Silicon Valley prompted such a large public debate on whether modernization is possible without democracy?

In my opinion, discussing the theory of modernization with Surkov is like discussing game theory with a con artist. If a casino craps table has a hidden magnet underneath and the blackjack dealer is using a stacked deck, the magnet and the dealer determine who wins, not game theory.

To understand which types of projects will be funded in the Silicon Valley dreamed up by Surkov, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov, we can forget about theory and just look at which projects already receive government financing.

Topping the list is scientist Viktor Petrik and his co-inventor, State Duma Speaker and United Russia leader Boris Gryzlov, who invented a perpetual motion machine and a real philosopher’s stone under the guise of a water-purification filter. Prior to Petrik, the last person to claim knowledge of the philosopher’s stone was a 18th-century Italian mystic and adventurer, Count Cagliostro. But Petrik, firmly grounded in 21st-century innovation, is boldly requesting 1.5 trillion rubles ($50.2 billion) for his filter device. He’ll probably get it, don’t you think?

Another miracle of Russian science is the Glonass satellite navigation system. This year, four separate budget items account for more than 10 billion rubles ($334 million) in funding for Glonass.

The most expensive part of the Glonass system is the Russian satellites, and they are already in orbit or are included among the secret items of the military budget. Thus, the 10 billion rubles is in addition to the main funding and is intended solely for developing the receiving device that differs little from an ordinary satellite telephone. That’s an awful lot of money for developing technology that already exists.

How about this for another example of modernization: In October, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and Rusnano director Anatoly Chubais visited the Mikron factory in Zelenograd outside Moscow where technicians had created Russia’s latest microchip with spans of only 180 nanometers. The visit also marked the signing of a $500 million agreement to purchase unbelievably advanced technology from the French and Italian STMicroelectronics firm capable of producing circuits with spans of only 90 nanometers. The problem is that elsewhere researchers have managed to halve the possible circuit span every 18 months or so, and just two weeks before Putin’s historic visit, Intel announced a microprocessor using spans of only 32 nanometers.

What is the point of buying European technology that is already outmoded and that will be obsolete by the time it is brought to market two years from now? That is just the easiest way to transfer money overseas.

So there is no reason to spend a lot of time discussing whether modernization is possible without democratization. The Chinese example proves that it is, in fact, possible. But that argument is irrelevant in this case. No matter how hard Surkov tries to build a Silicon Valley in Russia, it will just end up being another Lake Seliger.

Yulia Latynina hosts a political talk show on Ekho Moskvy radio.




Tags

technology innovation science



Also in Opinion

Putin Chasing Imaginary American Ghosts

Here we go again — another round of anti-Americanism from the Kremlin and state-controlled media. Blaming outside forces for Russia's woes has a long history in the country. The closer we get to the March 4 presidential election, the more intense the anti-American hysteria becomes.


Putting Everything In Its Place

Remember how I drove you all nuts with the innate propensity of Russian creatures and inanimate objects to stand, sit or lie? And how relieved you were when I moved on to other topics?
Well, I'm back.

Russia Gets Bad Rap Over Syria

As the violent standoff between Syria's security forces and armed opposition groups roils the country, the crisis has opened heated divisions at the United Nations Security Council.

A Propaganda Breakdown

Propaganda is not as powerful as many think. You might convince Russians that people in Egypt, Italy and Ukraine are paid or otherwise persuaded to join street protests, but you certainly cannot convince them that their own dissatisfaction with the government is the result of a foreign conspiracy.

Violent Reaction to Protests Could Bury Putin

Nonviolent revolutions do not always remain nonviolent, as the examples of uprisings in Egypt, Libya and Syria in the Arab Spring have shown. But peaceful movements for regime change often do succeed. For example, they have toppled illegitimate rulers, as with the post-Soviet Color Revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine, and ended apartheid in South Africa.

Realpolitik Without Realism

People have been asking me all week why the Kremlin is so stubbornly supportive of Syrian President Bashar Assad. "Is Russia's support based solely on weapons contracts with Syria," they wonder, "or the Kremlin's desire to maintain its naval base at the Tartus port?"




Discussion
The Moscow Times welcomes your comments and invites you to discuss topics with other readers. Your comment will be posted automatically to enable a live discussion. If you aren't familiar with our comments policy, you can read it here.

If you're a registered user, you can start typing your comment below. If not, take a moment to sign up. and then return to the article.

If your comment doesn't appear, contact us by using our web form.

Comments



Chris Babeouf

Oh dear so Democracy is essential for inovation in Russia but not China? And it of course it wasn't essential at the launch of the greatest innovation in Britain's history. The industrial revolution. At the official level TV , newspapers the West recognises itself as a Democratic system. At the unofficial level of the internet people scour web sites to roast anyone stupid enough to mouth the official line. Tracing the history of the collapse of the Democratic idea  a singnal  for the unwary. The promters of Parlimentary Absolutism have ceased to talk of self governing communites and talk instead of the selection of a ruler. Now here is a curious thing the author doesn't want to invest in older material technology. But is happy to invest in decayed political technology. 'You can take the boy out of the USSR but you can't take the USSR out of the boy'

 


Report Inappropriate Comment




Comments via Facebook

print


Comments

This article has 1 comment on TheMoscowTimes.com and 0 comments on Facebook.

Leave a comment


To Our Readers

The Moscow Times welcomes letters to the editor. Letters for publication should be signed and bear the signatory's address and telephone number.

Letters to the editor should be sent by fax to (7-495) 232-6529, by e-mail to oped@imedia.ru, or by post. The Moscow Times reserves the right to edit letters.



Most Read