Install

Get the latest updates as we post them — right on your browser

Today's paper. Last Updated: 02/10/2012

Ballyhoo Over Nothing

Russia has heaved a sigh of relief that Russian businessman Viktor Bout (not “suspected arms dealer,” since everyone is presumed innocent unless proven guilty in court) was not extradited from Thailand to the United States on Wednesday as earlier planned.

The problem is that the Bout case is an unfair and unfriendly gesture initiated by the United States. Bout must be released from his long and illegal detention.

Let me explain.

Bout, a 43-year-old former Russian army officer, was arrested in March 2008 in Bangkok in a sting operation at the request of the United States, which accused him of illegally trading arms. Thus, he has already spent nearly 2 1/2 years behind bars without any court ruling on whether he was directly involved in any sort of wrongdoing.

Furthermore, his wife, Alla, has complained that he is undernourished because he only gets meals twice a day. The Russian Consulate in Thailand has demanded that he be transferred to a larger cell having some other inmates and be treated fairly.

Viktor Bout has denied all charges, saying in an interview in February that they appeared “to be a response to my refusal to cooperate with U.S. special services and because of unfair competition from Western companies, and, in particular, from companies controlled by the CIA.”

Bout also said he was a victim of “a political chase that has lasted for many years.”

In August 2009, the Bangkok Criminal Court ruled in Bout’s favor, denying a U.S. extradition request because of lack of evidence and because it believed that the case was politically motivated. But the United States appealed the ruling and filed new charges against him. On Friday, a Thai appeals court ruled that Bout must be extradited to the United States within three months. His Thai lawyer said the ruling was solely on the merits of the extradition case and did not consider whether Bout was innocent or guilty of charges filed in the United States. The lawyer also noted that the new charges could prevent the extradition because a new case might have to be opened in Thailand.

Bout’s Russian lawyer said in an interview with Ekho Moskvy radio that his client was innocent and promised to do his utmost to secure his release from prison.

Washington is concerned that the extradition order will expire and Bout will be released from prison. Consequently, the United States is trying to withdraw the new charges in a bid to speed up his extradition.

Russia reacted strongly to Friday’s court decision. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov called it unlawful and politically motivated, suggesting that it was made to appease Washington. He also said Moscow would seek Bout’s repatriation to Russia.

The same day, the Foreign Ministry said in a diplomatically balanced but strongly worded statement that it was “extremely bewildered and disappointed” to learn of the extradition decision. Incidentally, the form of the statement — officially called “A Statement by the Russian Foreign Ministry” — was intentionally selected to highlight the issue. It is the highest in political value, as other forms of the ministry’s official reaction are called “Commentary” or “Press Release” and carry less political significance.

Moscow argues that the verdict appears highly questionable because the Thai Criminal Court last August found that the Americans had not provided sufficient proof of Bout’s guilt. Moscow also says Bout never committed any illegal acts on Thai soil and notes that Thai law enforcement agencies have dropped all charges against him.

Russia’s concerns were also personally delivered by a Russian deputy foreign minister to the Thai ambassador in Moscow on Friday.

Under the Russian Constitution, any Russian citizen is presumed innocent before a legal verdict is issued (Article 49). The Constitution also prohibits the extradition of any person to a foreign state over his or her political convictions (Article 63). As such, the Foreign Ministry has provided Bout and his family with complete legal and consular aid over the past 2 1/2 years. The Russian side has also promised to continue to offer Bout all possible assistance with the ultimate aim of securing his release and return home.

Taking into account Moscow’s firm support of Bout, who remains innocent under U.S., Thai and Russian law, the ballyhoo created by Washington over him may inevitably effect Russian-U.S. relations to the detriment of the U.S. effort to “reset” them.

The case is unfair, and Bout must be freed.

 Vladimir Kozin is deputy director of the information and press department at the Foreign Ministry. The views expressed here are his own.




Tags

arms dealing extradition United States Thailand



Also in Opinion

Putin Chasing Imaginary American Ghosts

Here we go again — another round of anti-Americanism from the Kremlin and state-controlled media. Blaming outside forces for Russia's woes has a long history in the country. The closer we get to the March 4 presidential election, the more intense the anti-American hysteria becomes.


Putting Everything In Its Place

Remember how I drove you all nuts with the innate propensity of Russian creatures and inanimate objects to stand, sit or lie? And how relieved you were when I moved on to other topics?
Well, I'm back.

Russia Gets Bad Rap Over Syria

As the violent standoff between Syria's security forces and armed opposition groups roils the country, the crisis has opened heated divisions at the United Nations Security Council.

A Propaganda Breakdown

Propaganda is not as powerful as many think. You might convince Russians that people in Egypt, Italy and Ukraine are paid or otherwise persuaded to join street protests, but you certainly cannot convince them that their own dissatisfaction with the government is the result of a foreign conspiracy.

Violent Reaction to Protests Could Bury Putin

Nonviolent revolutions do not always remain nonviolent, as the examples of uprisings in Egypt, Libya and Syria in the Arab Spring have shown. But peaceful movements for regime change often do succeed. For example, they have toppled illegitimate rulers, as with the post-Soviet Color Revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine, and ended apartheid in South Africa.

Realpolitik Without Realism

People have been asking me all week why the Kremlin is so stubbornly supportive of Syrian President Bashar Assad. "Is Russia's support based solely on weapons contracts with Syria," they wonder, "or the Kremlin's desire to maintain its naval base at the Tartus port?"




Discussion
The Moscow Times welcomes your comments and invites you to discuss topics with other readers. Your comment will be posted automatically to enable a live discussion. If you aren't familiar with our comments policy, you can read it here.

If you're a registered user, you can start typing your comment below. If not, take a moment to sign up. and then return to the article.

If your comment doesn't appear, contact us by using our web form.

Comments



Ballyhoo Over Nothing

If Bout is as innocent as Mr. Kozin suggests then what's there to worry about? US trials are conciderably more fair than trials in Russia where, according to official data, nearly 100% guilty verdicts are handed out by "judges". No wonder so many Russians file complaints to ECHR (European Court of Human Rights). Mr. Kozin should take som time reading more international press for a better understanding of how Russia is viewed these days. Confidence for fair competition in business, politicts, the rule of law, empathy for the poorer part of the population (and there are many poor people in Russia) is nearly null. Russia is lagging behind in almost any area compared to Europe and North America. Take a trip outside Moscow or St. Petersburg and you will be amazed.

Kind regards

Analyst 

Ballyhoo Over Nothing

I agree with the Analyst. If Russians truly believe that Bout is innocent, then let him have his day in court. Please don't tire us with diatribe about Russian constitution. just look around Russia to see how many citizens are treated by Russian courts and law enforcement agencies. Furthermore, the reset of Russian-American relation is beneficial to BOTH the US and Russia. All these thinly veiled treat (borderline blackmail) about how the relation will suffer is starting to tire many Americans. If Russians prefer to have the US as an enemy then let the government have the guts to say so unambiguously. All this rhetoric from this or that spokesperson is tiring.

Ballyhoo Over Nothing

@Anders Karlsson

Oh, you really can't realize, what Russia is worrying about?

Let me guess... may be, what another innocent man is going to become victim of american [in]justice?!

Probably, mr. Anders Karlsoon never heard -- USA is the country, which is running a set of concentration camps for its political adversaries all around the world, where prisoners are subject of abuse and torment. Never of them can expect open and fair trial? What "justice" you are fooling me to believe?!

You reference to ECHR is pointless -- Europe, at least, is not guilty in waging wars and keeping concentration camps! Yes, I heard about "Russians file complaints" to european courts -- but nobody heard about complaining to american court! Is your point to prove, what USA courts are far behind the european ones? If so, you did.

"Take a trip outside Moscow or St. Petersburg and you will be amazed."

You are starting to wonder too far from the point of the discussion. Quite predictable for the typical net.demagogue.

 

RE: Ballyhoo Over Nothing

In response to the commenter above.  Here is what you said:

"... Probably, mr. Anders Karlsoon never heard -- USA is the country, which is running a set of concentration camps for its political adversaries all around the world, where prisoners are subject of abuse and torment. Never of them can expect open and fair trial? What "justice" you are fooling me to believe?! ..."

You probably meant  to be talking about terrorists  and not "political adversaries" (otherwise you must be having a distorted flashback by recalling what is happening in Russia where opponents to the Kremlin are systematically silenced). Anyway, your memory lapse is forgiven.

Now  let's see, how many alleged terrorists are facing justice in Russian courts? Very few or none at all. Most of them have been simply "liquidated". You need to take a closer look around Russia before looking at what is happening elsewhere. Surely, the US is struggling trying to find a way to deal with terrorists picked up on the battlefield or elsewhere; finding a way to deal with then within any legal framework is a new challenge that we all face. On the one hand these jihadists can't simply be released to go back and plot other terrorist acts; on the other hand the jihadists' own dedication to their cause makes the task of finding the proper legal framework for putting them on trial difficult.

I am sorry to say that your diatribe seems to indicate a shallow view of things rather than a deeper appreciation of the challenges; else your disdain of the US is impeding your analytical abilities.

But we digress; no one is trying to put Bout in some "concentration camps" as you said. As Anders Karisson indicated, let Mr. Bout have his day in court. It will be transparent for ALL to see. And YOU will be very welcome to seat in the front row in that court and watch the proceedings.

Kind regards.


Report Inappropriate Comment




Comments via Facebook

print


Comments

This article has 4 comments on TheMoscowTimes.com and 0 comments on Facebook.

Leave a comment


To Our Readers

The Moscow Times welcomes letters to the editor. Letters for publication should be signed and bear the signatory's address and telephone number.

Letters to the editor should be sent by fax to (7-495) 232-6529, by e-mail to oped@imedia.ru, or by post. The Moscow Times reserves the right to edit letters.



Most Read