Install

Get the latest updates as we post them — right on your browser

Today's paper. Last Updated: 02/10/2012

3 Priorities, 3 Solutions in EU-Russian Ties

Russia is our strategic partner and a major player in many areas. Russia is also a European country and our close neighbor. The time is ripe to give a new boost to European Union-Russian relations, while continuing open and sincere dialogue based on common interests and values. It is no secret that the relations between the EU and Russia have suffered from differences of opinion and action and that a lot of work remains to be done on both sides to optimize the potential that the EU and Russia share.

The questions we should put to ourselves are quite simple: What are the fundamentals in our relationship, and, more important, what do we want to achieve together in 10 years?

Finland and Hungary share a long history with Russia, and both have joined the EU rather recently. In future relations with Russia, we see three priority goals.

The first relates to the economy. The EU is the most important export market for Russia, and Russia is among the top-three trading partners of the EU. Of foreign direct investments to Russia, about 80 percent come from EU countries. In energy, the interdependency is evident. Geographic proximity could contribute to the competitiveness of both Russia and the EU, but that should not be taken for granted in today’s world of global competition.

Currently, the most pressing issue is Russia’s accession to the World Trade Organization. Another key factor that would integrate our markets further is harmonization of technical standards. The EU has no reason to press Russia in this matter and no need to dictate the rules. But let’s be frank. A set of carefully prepared standards and legislation is there for Russia to grasp — that is, “euro standards” of proven high quality and earned consumer trust in Europe and elsewhere in the world. President Dmitry Medvedev, a committed supporter of modernization and innovation, has said European standards can’t be that bad. Also for Russian consumers, the euro standard has been synonymous with good quality for decades. Russian companies would be the ones benefiting the most from harmonized regulation because that would bolster their competitiveness in the European market.

The ultimate goal is a free-trade area between Russia and the EU. We should not see our economies as rivals but make them more attractive by means of enhanced integration. This could open a new window of opportunity for both in the increasingly competitive global market.

Second, we need to facilitate interaction between our people. Visa-free travel would benefit tens of millions of people. The EU and Russia agreed to pursue visa freedom as a long-term goal in 2003 and are committed to reaching it. But all technical and societal criteria have to be met. Russian and EU experts need to continue the discussions and examine where sufficient progress has been made and where steps still need to be taken. This paves the way for the negotiations on a visa-waiver agreement.

The third goal relates to foreign and security policies. Partnership can only be successful in the long run if it is value-based and pursued in the spirit of mutual respect and confidence. Progress has been made in the area of external security — for example, in international crisis management on the coast of Somalia and in Chad. But we could do much more together, including in the areas close to the EU and Russia, as well as in the civilian sector, like cooperation in emergency situations.

The initiative put forward by German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Medvedev on deepening cooperation between the EU and Russia in foreign and security policies should be explored further. The potential of the existing Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe and NATO structures can and should also be made use of more effectively. Such an approach could be a good starting point for finding solutions to conflicts. Any efforts to find solutions in conflict areas of common interest, however, can and must only be pursued through involvement of and cooperation with other Eastern European countries, especially the countries directly affected.

Our strategic aim should be a common area not only for external but also for European security as both the EU and Russia are stakeholders of European stability and security and keen to enhance it.

What steps need to be taken to improve the EU-Russian partnership?

First, the EU has to do its own homework. We should be more united and act faster. A strategic discussion on Russia within the EU would be very welcome. We also need to discuss our common priorities and actions together with Russia to move from partnership to equal ownership, that is, an equal and genuine commitment to enhancing our relationship.

Second, we need a modern, legally binding basis for our relationship. Both sides are already negotiating what is called the “New Agreement” to achieve this goal.

Third, more effective working structures are required to implement the New Agreement and the so-called four common spaces of cooperation including the partnership for modernization. We propose to start evaluation work immediately, together with our Russian partners.

With the new structures created in the Lisbon Treaty, the EU is now in a better position to strengthen its foreign policy. High Representative Catherine Ashton and the future EU’s External Action Service, or EEAS, have an important role to play in fostering EU-Russian relations. These relations should be one of the priority areas for the EEAS from the very start.

Committed and active member states are essential for the EEAS to be successful. The EU-Russian relations rely to a large extent on bilateral experience. Bilateral relations and EU-Russian relations do not contradict one another but are complementary. It doesn’t matter whether the spokesman is in Brussels, Berlin, Paris, London, Warsaw, Stockholm, Budapest, Helsinki or any other EU capital as long as the main messages are the same and we practice what we preach. For its part, Russia should be clear in its EU policy and willing to enhance its own working structures.

The most important factor in building a strong EU-Russian relationship is mutual trust and playing by the same rules. On many issues, the ball is now in Russia’s court, but when the ball comes back to our court, we have to be ready and fit to play. Together, Russia and the EU can do a lot to help make the world a better and safer place.

Janos Martonyi is the foreign minister of Hungary, and Alexander Stubb is the foreign minister of Finland.




Tags

EU Europe WTO visas OSCE NATO External Action Service



Also in Opinion

Putin Chasing Imaginary American Ghosts

Here we go again — another round of anti-Americanism from the Kremlin and state-controlled media. Blaming outside forces for Russia's woes has a long history in the country. The closer we get to the March 4 presidential election, the more intense the anti-American hysteria becomes.


Putting Everything In Its Place

Remember how I drove you all nuts with the innate propensity of Russian creatures and inanimate objects to stand, sit or lie? And how relieved you were when I moved on to other topics?
Well, I'm back.

Russia Gets Bad Rap Over Syria

As the violent standoff between Syria's security forces and armed opposition groups roils the country, the crisis has opened heated divisions at the United Nations Security Council.

A Propaganda Breakdown

Propaganda is not as powerful as many think. You might convince Russians that people in Egypt, Italy and Ukraine are paid or otherwise persuaded to join street protests, but you certainly cannot convince them that their own dissatisfaction with the government is the result of a foreign conspiracy.

Violent Reaction to Protests Could Bury Putin

Nonviolent revolutions do not always remain nonviolent, as the examples of uprisings in Egypt, Libya and Syria in the Arab Spring have shown. But peaceful movements for regime change often do succeed. For example, they have toppled illegitimate rulers, as with the post-Soviet Color Revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine, and ended apartheid in South Africa.

Realpolitik Without Realism

People have been asking me all week why the Kremlin is so stubbornly supportive of Syrian President Bashar Assad. "Is Russia's support based solely on weapons contracts with Syria," they wonder, "or the Kremlin's desire to maintain its naval base at the Tartus port?"




Discussion
The Moscow Times welcomes your comments and invites you to discuss topics with other readers. Your comment will be posted automatically to enable a live discussion. If you aren't familiar with our comments policy, you can read it here.

If you're a registered user, you can start typing your comment below. If not, take a moment to sign up. and then return to the article.

If your comment doesn't appear, contact us by using our web form.

Comments



3 Priorities, 3 Solutions in EU-Russian Ties

I read twice and the first and last impression is: “fried air”.

Is Russia ready? Isn’t Russia ready?

Come on, it would be more honest saying that Europe is not ready. Europe is lying in the stratosphere! Europe is a chameleon; can only say nyes (neither “no” nor “yes”) to Russia requests.

The way Europe is dealing with this visa-free issue is insane and toe-curling.

It would be better for Russia to play down its interest for Europe: Bruxelles has nothing to offer.

They understand just crude business relations, let get them. And if they will ask Russia something else, tell you’re busy with something more important and useful and funny: sorry, I’m polishing my toenails! No time for your boring summits. See you in ten years, my dear (Europe)!

3 Priorities, 3 Solutions in EU-Russian Ties

1 Priority, 1 Solution in EU-Russian Ties

Visa-Free Travel?

Have Messrs. Martonyi and Stubb tried getting - as ordinary EU citizens, rather than as Foreign Ministers - even a Tourist Visa for Russia?   The deliberately obstructive electronic forms, that take hours to fill out - even for practiced experts?  The exorbitant fees?  The need for an ''Invitation''?  The financial guarantees needed?  The rigidly enforced itinerary?  The required insurance policies?  The Foreign Exchange declarations?  The delays?  The occasional, incomprehensible refusals of a visa?

WTO membership?

Russia [and countries like it] are the reason the WTO exists.  They are the ''anti-WTO'':  a consistent policy of ''Politico-mercantilism''.  Toe the Russian [actually, the Putin] line, and your trade with Russia becomes magically easier.  Refuse to ''toe the line'', and bad things happen [wine from Georgia, Borjomi Water, wine from Moldova, gas to Ukraine, pork and chicken from the US, water between the upstream and downstream 'Stans', sugar from Cuba, uranium to Iran . . . . . . the list is endless].  Borders are opened or closed; trucks - particularly carrying perishable foods - are delayed until the produce has rotted.  All at the whim of the Kremlin.   

So:  1 Priority, 1 Solution

Be done with Putin, Putinism and the ''Power Vertical''

If the Russian people will do that, the rest will follow automatically.  Until then; no way.

It's for the Russian people to decide.

RE: 3 Priorities, 3 Solutions in EU-Russian Ties

Giles, I agree for the first part of your comment: you really know, on your skin and pockets, what is asking a visa exactly as I too know and live every time; only, if you have some spare time in Russia, ask the Russians which kind of hell they have to cross for a ’luxurious’ Schengen visa and you’ll feel some relief.

About Borjomi and so on, please take some time to consider 50 years long Usa and European embargo against Cuba, Vietnam, N. Korea, Iran and so on; we don’t have any Putin, we have (had) Bush, Obama , Sarkozy, Merkel, Blair and these amusing European leaders who even don’t know how many Europeans need to cross the Russian border dayly. About revenges, Russia can’t teach anything to the West, be sure; the have only to learn!

About Russian people; asking them to wait till Belarus, Georgia, Armenia and Azerbajan, and why not Tajikistan, Kirghisistan, Usbekistan and, who knows, ‘Moon-stan’ get biometric passports to accomplish Euro requirements, to get the visa system scrapped is forcing them to walk along a nationalist path, that’s Putin. In Bruxelles, they are probably waiting for Russia to scrap unilaterally visas (like Ukraine and Georgia already did for nothing). Till Putin (and Medvedev) say no, up with Russia! If Europe wants relations only with banana-republics, it's better get a tour in a greengrocer's shop.

 

 

 

 


Report Inappropriate Comment




Comments via Facebook

print


Comments

This article has 3 comments on TheMoscowTimes.com and 0 comments on Facebook.

Leave a comment


To Our Readers

The Moscow Times welcomes letters to the editor. Letters for publication should be signed and bear the signatory's address and telephone number.

Letters to the editor should be sent by fax to (7-495) 232-6529, by e-mail to oped@imedia.ru, or by post. The Moscow Times reserves the right to edit letters.



Most Read