The MT Conferences section did not involve the reporting or the editorial staff of The Moscow Times.
Ilya Skripnikov
Of counsel
Dentons
The Russian government has recently prepared and introduced in the State Duma a set of amendments to the Concession Law. This is the 13th round of amendments since adoption of the law in 2005.
The market sees the proposed changes as highly favorable for the further development of public-private partnerships in Russia, and many of them have been expected for several years. Considering the "financial nature" of these new amendments, financial institutions and lenders are among the main beneficiaries of these new rules.
Key changes include the introduction of the availability model, minimal revenue guarantees, extension of the list of concession objects and cases where direct agreements can be signed.
The extension of the list of concession objects by adding the concept of "other property" and the introduction of the "availability model" for all concession objects are among the most innovative proposals of the draft law.
Currently, only automobile roads infrastructure projects allow indirect toll schemes. Social and healthcare projects —where demand and revenue risks are very high — should benefit from the new rules as the private sector seeks to lower and mitigate these risks. Concessionaires in the utilities sector are also very concerned by these issues.
Direct agreements, a key security document for the lenders in public-private partnership projects, can also be signed with respect to any project — not only automobile roads and infrastructure. Lenders will have the right to agree the substitution of the concessionaire without procurement of an additional concession tender, provided the material conditions of the concession agreement are not altered.
Another important step in the development of PPPs is the introduction of the idea to allow the public sector not to procure a tender if a project is initiated by the potential concessionaire.
The government believes that this approach should accelerate the conclusion of concession agreements without a tender in cases where there is only one potentially interested private partner. Considering the complicated procedure and the time-consuming nature of the tender process, the amended legal framework could potentially increase the volume of concession projects, particularly at the regional level.
To promote investment in the renovation and development of state-owned infrastructure, the draft law expands the mandatory content of concession agreements by including gross revenue of the concessionaire during the operation stage of a project and introducing an appropriate minimal revenue guarantee concept.
The draft law provides for additional guarantees of return on the concessionaire's investment and receipt of the revenue provided for in the concession agreement. This approach will also mitigate the revenue risk of the private investor in the event of force majeure or acts by state authorities that make it impossible for the parties to the concession agreement to respect the terms of the agreement.
An additional "equilibrium" mechanism is proposed which is aimed at the right of a concessionaire to demand variation of the concession agreement in cases where a decision of a court or the federal antimonopoly authority influences the ability of the concessionaire to perform its obligations under the concession agreement.
Last but not least, one of the key provisions of the draft law is the possibility to procure the concession tender where the public side is represented by several grantors.
This will likely trigger the initiation of cross-regional concession projects in multiple areas, with primary focus on transport, water, community services and healthcare. In addition, joint tenders involving regions and municipalities can be procured for waste projects, kindergardens, schools and leisure services.
The MT Conferences section did not involve the reporting or the editorial staff of The Moscow Times.
A Message from The Moscow Times:
Dear readers,
We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."
These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.
We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.
Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.
By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.
Remind me later.
