On March 2, former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev turned 80. If the history books were to judge him strictly for his results while in office, he would be deemed a tragic figure in history. Not only did he fail to resolve the problems facing the country, but the country itself ceased to exist.
But the scale of his personality and his political ability become clear against the backdrop of the insurmountable tasks that Gorbachev placed before himself and his country. Gorbachev had to contend with higher expectations right from the outset. Even now, his legacy is always evaluated on the basis of those elevated expectations. They were the result of years of propaganda and the informational and cultural isolation in which Soviet citizens lived. For example, most people believed that they were not much worse off than people in the United States and Europe when, in fact, their standard of living was significantly lower. Similarly, many believed that Soviet science and education were the best in the world when, in reality, only two or three narrow fields were highly advanced.
Gorbachev was subjected to standards never applied to his predecessors. Intellectuals quickly found fault with his southern accent and mistakes in speech. Who would have given serious thought to evaluating the thoughts or speech of former Soviet leaders Konstantin Chernenko, Mikhail Suslov, Andrei Gromyko or Yegor Ligachev? In comparison with his predecessors and contemporaries, Gorbachev was both Spinoza and Demosthenes. But, Gorbachev was unfairly compared to U.S. President Ronald Reagan and British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.
The Gorbachev period of 1985-91 is one of the most interesting chapters in recent political history. Russia has hundreds of political science departments among its universities, but not a single leading institution held a seminar or round-table discussion to discuss the Gorbachev legacy. Of course, Gorbachev is not to blame for our inability to discuss what is important and even interesting. Happy birthday, Mr. Gorbachev.
Konstantin Sonin is a professor at the New Economic School in Moscow and a columnist for Vedomosti.
A Message from The Moscow Times:
Dear readers,
We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."
These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.
We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.
Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.
By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.
Remind me later.
