Ian Rose
Partner
Salans
The U.K. Bribery Act 2010 (the “Act”) will enter into force in April 2011. The Act and its expected enforcement propel the United Kingdom to the forefront of the fight against international bribery and corruption.
The Act consolidates existing U.K. laws on bribery, but it also introduces two new offenses, that is, bribing a foreign public official, which implements the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s convention on the subject and which applies to individuals and companies, and failing to prevent bribery, which applies to companies.
The new criminal offense of failing to prevent bribery has enormous significance for companies with any kind of presence in the United Kingdom, however minor that presence may be. The offense applies to any company that carries on a business, or part of a business, in the United Kingdom, and it relates to the whole of its international operations. Accordingly, a Russian company having a subsidiary or branch office in the United Kingdom, or even merely listing shares in the United Kingdom but not otherwise being present in the United Kingdom, is potentially caught in relation to its operations in Russia and throughout the world.
Companies that commit the offense of failing to prevent bribery face criminal penalties of unlimited fines, as well as possible disbarment from tendering for contracts across the European Union, civil claims and, of course, reputational damage.
The offense is structured in terms of making it an offense on the part of the company, if any person associated with the company, which includes not only employees but third parties such as intermediaries and agents — in fact any person who performs services for or on behalf of the company — bribes another person, intending to obtain or retain business, or an advantage in the conduct of business, for the company. The only defense available is for the company to prove that it had in place adequate procedures designed to prevent such associated persons from committing such bribery.
The Act therefore effectively requires any company that carries on a business, or part of a business, in the United Kingdom to have adequate procedures in place to prevent bribery anywhere in the world, not only by its own staff, but also by anyone acting on its behalf before public officials and private sector partners.
How can companies ensure that they will be in compliance when the Act comes into force in April 2011? In order to ensure compliance, an independent assessment of existing anti-bribery measures should be undertaken, commissioned by the board. If no existing anti-bribery measures are in place, then to start from the beginning requires investment in terms of time, commitment and responsibility. The key steps include undertaking a full, global risk assessment; developing an anti-bribery action plan; creating a code of ethical conduct and policies to guide compliance with the code, including on gifts and hospitality, political donations, lobbying and handling cash; developing a system of checks and controls within the financial management system to ensure implementation of the policies; and integrating the anti-bribery procedures into the company’s structure through measures such as training, “whistleblower” support to staff, reviewing contracts with third parties and employee performance reviews.
In addition to engaging professionals to advise on the compliance process, some assistance will be provided by the U.K. government guidelines on adequate procedures, which will be finalized in the new year. In addition, there is a body of other guidance that can be used to prepare anti-bribery procedures, such as various OECD and Transparency International publications, and the extensive history of enforcement of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
The criminal, reputational and contractual risks of involvement in bribery, or of not preventing bribery by others acting on the company’s behalf, are high. The Act significantly strengthens the United Kingdom’s legal framework for the prosecution of bribery anywhere in the world, and it imposes wide-ranging requirements on companies proactively to ensure that bribery is prevented.
A Message from The Moscow Times:
Dear readers,
We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."
These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.
We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.
Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.
By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.
Remind me later.
