Support The Moscow Times!

Uralkali Stock Stares Into A Chasm

A sinkhole in the Perm region, seen in July, has forced the construction of two new rail links to transport potash. Oksana Onipko
In a week when all investors in Russia were holding their breath, the bluest faces had to belong to Uralkali shareholders.

Catching both the market and the potash producer by surprise, Deputy Prime Minister Igor Sechin reopened a 2006 investigation into the flooding of a Uralkali mine, sending the company's shares — darlings of the Russian market not long ago ?€” down 75 percent in London in the three trading days after the announcement.

The losses came on top of the 75 percent Uralkali had already fallen since this summer.

The flood, ruled an accident in the original probe, created an enormous sinkhole in the Perm region, which is home to both Uralkali and its main rival Silvinit, the country's largest producer of fertilizer. What's worse, the hole is spreading and has already forced the construction of two new rail links to export the companies' potash.

A state commission will now decide whether the fertilizer producer will have to pay reparations, which analysts say could range anywhere from $600 million to $2.6 billion, depending on the state's ultimate intentions. The commission is expected to issue a decision by the end of the month.

For its part, Uralkali said it was surprised by the decision to reopen the investigation but that it would cooperate fully.

"We have no information as to why this decision was made," the company said in a statement. "We believe that the first commission comprised recognized experts; that its investigation was competent and comprehensive, and we see no reason to question its conclusions."

The circumstances surrounding Uralkali drew immediate comparisons to Prime Minister Vladimir Putin's public assault on coal miner Mechel this summer. The involvement of Rosneft chairman Igor Sechin, a deputy chief of staff to then-President Putin who was seen as the engine behind the dismantling of Yukos, generated echoes of that affair as well.

In a somewhat hopeful sign for Uralkali, however, chemicals analysts said the investigation could be an attempt to pressure the company into forking over some cash to help pay for the new railroad links and the relocation of regional power producer TGK-9.

While in the past higher transport prices have helped Russian Railways finance such projects with assistance from the state, the government is now looking, with an eye on inflation, to cap freight-carrying charges.

Potash, a little-noticed asset until prices took off this year, garnered momentum as grain shortages produced greater demand for fertilizer. In the year through September, Uralkali's revenue rose 150 percent, under Russian accounting standards, and its net profit rose 470 percent, the company said Friday.

It had been reported earlier that the company's net profits had jumped by 370 percent year on year for the first three quarters of 2008, according to Russian accounting standards.

Majority-owned by billionaire Dmitry Rybolovlev, who also holds 25 percent of Silvinit, Uralkali is the country's second-largest potash producer and third-largest in the world. It exports 90 percent of its output, primarily to the other BRIC markets ?€” Brazil, India and China.

"Until now, the government was not particularly interested in the [fertilizer] sector," said Yelena Sakhnova, senior analyst at VTB. "It was very small compared with oil and gas and even metals, and it was not strategically important."

Should the state find Uralkali liable for the accident, however, fines against the company could extend above Uralkali's current cash position, forcing the company into bankruptcy and leaving it open to a possible state takeover.

Sakhnova said that, in the best-case scenario, Uralkali would only have to help cover the costs of building railway bypasses, relocating local Berezniki residents and transporting the nearby TGK-9 power facilities, a total of $600 million to $800 million ?€” an "unpleasant but not devastating" figure for Uralkali.

The worst-case scenario would bring charges of up to $2.6 billion, to cover the drop in tax revenues from lost reserves, a figure likely to dump the company into state hands ?€” something Sakhnova said would hurt the entire market.

"We think that right now the state is concentrating on the crisis and isn't prepared to take such actions," she said.

In the immediate term, analysts are more concerned about negotiations of a new potash contract with China in December. If negotiations stretch on for months, as they have in the past, the Uralkali affair could reduce the industry's leverage in striking a deal with its biggest global importer.

Since Uralkali fell to $5.01 in London on Tuesday ?€” its lowest closing price in the company's history, the stock has gradually rebounded both in Moscow and London. In London, the stock rose 15.4 percent on Thursday, or 84 cents. On Friday, the shares finished up 24 percent, at $7.80 in London, and up 13.9 percent in Moscow at $44.87.

Sakhnova said investors still might have reason to fear the beginnings of a state takeover until the commission releases more information.

"In the worst of the worst scenarios, where the government would try to go not only for Uralkali but for the whole industry, the government might try to create one company in Russia that would be producing potash," Sakhnova said.

But given the current circumstances, she said, the state had likely bigger concerns than an overhaul of the national potash industry.

Sign up for our free weekly newsletter

Our weekly newsletter contains a hand-picked selection of news, features, analysis and more from The Moscow Times. You will receive it in your mailbox every Friday. Never miss the latest news from Russia. Preview
Subscribers agree to the Privacy Policy

A Message from The Moscow Times:

Dear readers,

We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia's Prosecutor General's Office has designated The Moscow Times as an "undesirable" organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a "foreign agent."

These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work "discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership." We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.

We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help.

Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It's quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.

By supporting The Moscow Times, you're defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.

Once
Monthly
Annual
Continue
paiment methods
Not ready to support today?
Remind me later.

Read more